If bribery a basic cow sounds controllable enough to you, then you must be new here. In 2017, everything’s offensive, even the banal act of anticipation dairy from a fake cow.

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an alignment which itself has come under fire for animal cruelty, has taken issue with one of Nintendo’s launch titles for the Switch. , which our own Napier Lopez got to take for a spin prior to the console’s launch, appearance a minigame that allows players to milk a basic cow.

In a letter to Nintendo from PETA architect Ingrid E. Newkirk, the alignment took issue with the lack of accuracy in a game advised as much for gameplay as it is for making you look like an idiot.

Our staffers and activists have afresh played the cow-milking minigame for Nintendo Switch and accomplished you’ve taken all the animality out of milking. We have more than 35 years of acquaintance investigating dairy farms where cows are exploited for their milk, and it is NEVER that affable for these animals. Can we have some accuracy here, please?

Whether or not you agree with Newkirk’s message, you have to be at least a little anxious with addition accommodating to wage a faux war with a aggregation that didn’t make much of an effort to present the game in any sort of astute way. This isn’t a VR cow bribery simulation (although now I can assure you one’s coming), and there aren’t even any cows shown on the screen during the bribery action — only during the game’s start screen, and a anchored cow agriculture while it’s artful the totals.

What Newkirk is doing is the same thing PETA has drawn criticism for in the past, being affronted for the sake of being outraged. Not to acknowledgment it’s a hypocritical stance for an alignment known for euthanizing more than 90 percent of animals it “rescues.”

This is the point where PETA argues “no we don’t” and I save you from the bullshit by pointing out just one of dozens of complaints adjoin PETA from inspectors nationwide, this one from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. You can read the full account from the ambassador here, but let’s just dive into the good bits:

  • PETA initially claimed the area being inspected wasn’t an animal apartment and that they had never operated one out of this area — except, it had been inspected in the past, as an animal shelter.
  • There were three animal enclosures. The ambassador noted: “The ability does not accommodate acceptable animal enclosures to commonly house the number of animals annually appear as taken into custody.”
  • 290 animals were “rescued” in 2010, of these only 6-percent were adopted while 94-percent were euthanized. 245 were euthanized within 24 hours of their rescue.

PETA, for all intents and purposes, is a shitty alignment that masquerades as the protector of animals while killing nearly all of them it rescues. “They were sick, injured, or unadoptable,” are common PETA retorts when faced with this information, but affirmation exists to the contrary. Even a veterinarian who aboveboard turned animals over to PETA for rescue testified that they were “healthy” and “adoptable” after award out they’d been euthanized.

I only acknowledgment this to point out the affectation of being affronted over a game that appearance fake cow milking.

Personally, I think the fake abuse has served PETA well. How else do you get an alignment that provides basal impact to the abundance of animals in the news repeatedly? In this case, though, I think insinuating Nintendo is somehow adverse for animals due to — its truly abhorrent minigame — is conceivably a bit oversensitive.

Read next: Doodle 4 Google winner envisions a happy future