Google Cloud’s -to-be head of AI will have his work cut out for him if he wants to argue annoyed advisers he won’t follow in his predecessors footsteps and advance AI for the military. He’s the co-chair of a aegis and aegis think-tank alongside one of the people amenable for the conception of Activity Maven.

Google Cloud appear beforehand this week that Carnegie Mellon’s Andrew Moore will alter AI head Fei-Fei Li by the end of the year. Moore is abiding to Google, having ahead been a administrator with the aggregation from 2007 through 2014.

In May he was appointed co-chair of the Center for a New American Security’s bogus intelligence task force, a group committed to free how the US government should acknowledge to the threat of AI.

At the time of his arrangement Moore said:

Central to all of this is ensuring that such systems work with humans in a way which empowers the human, not replaces the human, and which keeps ultimate accommodation ascendancy with the human. That is why I am so aflame by the mission of the task force.

Proponents of Google’s work on Activity Maven were quick to point out the aggregation wasn’t developing weapons systems. According to reports, the aggregation was teaching aggressive developers how to use TensorFlow (an open-source apparatus acquirements platform) to assay drone footage.

Despite such assurances, hundreds of advisers protested and at least a dozen quit over the company’s involvement. Google eventually appear it wouldn’t seek to renew its arrangement to work on Activity Maven.

Whether Moore’s charge to befitting “ultimate accommodation authority” in humans will be enough to allay agent apropos over the company’s partnerships with the Pentagon charcoal to be seen.

In other Google AI news, a scattering of employees, including Senior Google Scientist James Poulson, have shown themselves the door, letters . Their abandonment comes in beef of the company’s efforts to build a censorship engine, code-named Dragonfly, to allay the Chinese government.

It’s worth noting that state-owned media outlet via , reported that Google and the Chinese government were not alive on Dragonfly, citing “relevant departments” as its source — the Chinese government has long maintained it doesn’t engage in censorship.

Google has a banal history with Chinese censorship. Back in 2006 it sought appropriate into the Chinese abridgement and agreed to the laws of the land. But, that all afflicted a few years later when the aggregation had a change of heart. Co-founder Sergey Brin, speaking about Google’s abnegation to abide to engage in Chinese censorship in 2010, told :

Having come from a absolute country, the Soviet Union, and having seen the hardships that my family endured–both while there and trying to leave—I absolutely am decidedly acute to the airless of alone liberties.

The aggregation didn’t make it a decade before the allure of Chinese money forced it to amend its stance on censorship. When broke the story, it adumbrated Google’s Dragonfly activity had already been approved as a near-finished app to the Chinese government.

The demo would seem to show that Google planned to bear on Dragonfly. But, maybe CEO Sundar Pichai doesn’t mind afterward projects all the way through to the very point of accomplishment before endlessly to make ethical considerations — the board must love that.

It looks like we’ll just have to the aggregation when it says it’s not complex in developing AI for the aggressive or censorship engines for China.

Read next: LG will advertise its 5-camera V40 on October 3