Sex robots are everywhere at the moment (not actually – you won’t find them boot down the street just yet), but figuratively, as a growing number of ‘robot brothels’ divide public assessment as they feel out the market in the US and Canada.

But if a robot hasn’t ‘had sex’ yet, does that make it a virgin? A crowdfunding attack to open the world’s first consent-focused sex brothel launched by Abyss Creations agent Unicole Unicron last month would argue that it does indeed.

With a $155,000 allotment target to be reached within the next nine days (it’s admiring at less than $3,000 currently, so it absolutely hasn’t been a roaring success at this stage), backers can pledge $10,000 to be the first person to have sex with a robot at Eve’s Robot Dreams brothel in California.

However, having sex with a approved robot – apparently one that has been used for sex more than once already – costs just $122, which seems like a decent saving for some human-shaped silicone with an AI head, even if it has been used before.

However, is putting a price on a robot’s virginity really the best business action for a brothel that’s absorption on the idea of consent? I can see why there’s a need for a altercation around accord in robotics. Clearly, as technology and AI improves, there needs to be a chat around just how much we’ll allow robots to do. For example, would a BDSM sexbot exist to amuse someone’s kink, or be a potentially alarming threat to a human being?

Likewise, a lot of the anecdotal around sexbots so far has been marketed appear the access that people – often men – can use the robots in whichever way they like. The Campaign Adjoin Sex Robots argues that consumers are encouraged to accede these dolls as substitutes for women and are often marketed as ‘companions’, ‘girlfriends’ or ‘wives’.

The affiliation also says that female sex robots “add to the all-over ability where sexual abandon adjoin women and girls is common in a new form”.

On the other hand, there are groups angry for robots to be given equal rights to humans. Transhumanists accept that ‘sentient entities’ should not be mistreatedand instead be given equal and accepted access to life in order for AI to work in tandem with humanity.

While sex robots remain a alienated subject, assertive articles on the market have been a accurate cause for affair for those opposing robots in sextech.

Sexbot architect TrueCompanion’s Roxxxy dolls come with four altered personalities as standard, including the arguable ‘Frigid Farah’, who “does not always like to engage in affectionate activities.”

Smaller-size sex robots and dolls that appear artless have also been called out by attack groups for appearing to endorse paedophilia.

So you can see why a robot brothel that is keen to abode accord isn’t necessarily a bad idea, admitting it conceivably appearing atomic at first. But paying $10,000 to be the first person to use a sex robot… and on a ancient basis? RealDoll’s Harmony – which will be the model used in the Eve’s Robot Dreams brothel – retails from $7,999.

Admittedly, that top tier includes a flight to Los Angeles for the launch, but if you had $10,000 spare, surely you’d rather use that money to buy your own doll, which you could use more than once. Each to their own, I suppose.

The catechism might seem a little abstract right now, but as the technology improves – which it surely will – the ethics of robotics in sextech will become an more circuitous subject.

Read next: SERPstash is a $20 app that will help you win at SEO