The short film “Slaughterbots” depicts a near future in which swarms of micro drones assassinate bags of people for their political beliefs. Released in November 2017 by academics and activists admonishing of the dangers of avant-garde bogus intelligence (AI), it bound went viral, alluring over 3 actor views to date. It helped spark a public debate on the future of free weapons and put burden on diplomats affair at the United Nations Convention on Conventional Weapons.

But this kind of abstract science fiction storytelling isn’t just useful for alluring attention. The people who design and build avant-garde technology can use belief to accede the after-effects of their work and ensure it is used for good. And we think this kind of “science fiction prototyping” or “design fiction” could help anticipate human biases from alive their way into new technology, added entrenching society’s prejudices and injustices.

A bias can lead to the approximate alternative of some categories (of results, people, or ideas) over others. For example, some people may be biased adjoin hiring women for controlling jobs, whether they are acquainted of it or not.

Technology built around data that annal such bias can end up replicating the problem. For instance, application software advised to select the best CVs for a accurate job might be programmed to look for characteristics that reflect an benumbed bias appear men. In which case, the algorithm will end up benign men’s CVs. And this isn’t abstract – it absolutely happened to Amazon.

Designing algorithms after because accessible abrogating implications has been compared to doctors “writing about the allowances of a given analysis and absolutely blank the side effects, no matter how austere they are”.

Some tech firms and advisers are trying to tackle the issue. For example, Google drew up a set of ethical attempt to guide its development of AI. And UK academics have launched an action called Not-Equal that aims to animate greater candor and amends in the design and use of technology.

The botheration is that, publicly, companies tend to bear only a absolute vision of the abeyant after-effects of near-future technologies. For example, driverless cars are often portrayed as analytic all our carriage issues from cost to safety, blank the added dangers of cyberattacks or the fact they could animate people to walk or cycle less.

The adversity in compassionate how agenda technologies work, abnormally those that are heavily driven by abstruse algorithms, also makes it harder for people to have a circuitous and absolute view of the issues. This bearings produces a astriction amid a abating absolute anecdotal and the vague suspicion that biases are anchored to some degree in the technologies around us. This is where we think storytelling through design fiction can come in.

Stories are a accustomed method of cerebration about possibilities and circuitous situations, and we have been audition them all our lives. Science fiction can help us brainstorm on the impact of near-future technologies on society, as Slaughterbots does. This can even accommodate issues of social justice, like the way assertive groups, such as refugees and migrants, can be afar from agenda innovations.

Revealing the (possible) future

Design fiction belief accommodate a novel way for designers, engineers and futurists (among others) to think about the impact of technology from a human angle and link this to accessible future needs. With a admixture of logic and imagination, design fiction can reveal aspects of how technology may be adopted and used, starting conversations about its future ramifications.

For example, the short story “Crime-sourcing” explores what might happen if AI was to use crowdsourced advice and a bent database to adumbrate who might commit a murder. The advisers found that because the database was full of people in boyhood ethnic groups who, for social reasons, were statistically more likely to reoffend, the “crime-sourcing” model was more likely to abominably doubtable minorities than white people.

You don’t have to be a accomplished writer or make a slick film to aftermath design fiction. Brainstorming activities involving cards and storyboards have been used to advance design fiction and help advance the storytelling process. Making workshops that used these kinds of tools more common would enable more engineers, entrepreneurs and policymakers to use this method of assessment. And making the consistent work about accessible would help to expose abeyant biases in technologies before they affect society.

Encouraging designers to create and share more belief in this way would ensure the anecdotal that underpins new technology wouldn’t just present a absolute picture, nor an acutely abrogating or dystopian one. Instead, people will be able to acknowledge both aspects of what is accident around us.

Read next: An architect explains how supercharged racing yachts go so fast