Despite that the first coder and writer of a compiler were women, today in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, women are grossly underrepresented. Dating back to the 1800’s, affecting scientists, including Charles Darwin believed women were “biologically inferior to men.” These “antiquated” behavior didn’t stay in the 18th aeon either. Just last year, an architect from Google appear a whole manifesto account the assorted ways women were biologically altered from men, and urged Google to have an “honest altercation about the costs and allowances of our assortment programs.”

Now, a peer-reviewed bookish journal, ‘Quantitative Science Studies,’ made the arguable accommodation to publish a paper that claims men are inherently better suited for a career in physics than women — and concludes that women don’t face any more career hurdles than their male counterparts.

In the study, the author and physicist, Alessandro Strumia, examines 1.3 actor physics papers, appear from 1970 to this year. After anecdotic the authors by gender, Strumia attempts to explain how bound women with PhDs in physics are hired, how soon they broadcast papers, and how long they abide to do so, according to Science News. 

As appear by ScienceInsider, Strumia’s primary takeaway is that men and women have equal opportunities in axiological physics, and women don’t necessarily face a more adverse work environment. “This is what comes out from the data,” Strumia says. “I accept [this] because I see this in the data.”

Critics have acicular out that his allegation are filled with ‘unsubstantiated claims.’ Strumia’s alignment assured that men and women physicists have agnate opinions about which papers deserve to be cited, and that the authors of both genders cite their own studies at agnate rates. This award diverges from a 2016 analysis, which Strumia cites, that assured male authors cite their own work on boilerplate 56 percent more than female authors.

Cassidy Sugimoto, an advice scientist at Indiana University who has appear studies on the gender disparities in science told the Science News that the study is “methodologically flawed” and “fails to meet the standards of the bibliometric association and doesn’t appropriately cite or altercate papers that come to adverse conclusions.”

Last year, Strumia, faced boundless criticism after a presentation he gave at a appointment held by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. In his talk, he claimed that physics was built and invented by men. 

One of his slides absolute said, “Physics is not sexist adjoin women.” In response, more than 3,000 physicists signed a letter adopting concerns, which led CERN to cut all ties with Strumia beforehand this year.

Systematic barriers that face women in STEM

STEM’s assortment issues are afflicted by long-believed civic stereotyping on gender. Dr. Jess Wade, a physicist in the Blackett Laboratory at Imperial College London and activist alive to fix the gender alterity in science, told TNW: “Our association tells accouchement they’re good at altered things, whether it’s pink and blue toys, whatever accouterment accouchement wear, and the books they read — girls are told from an abundantly young age that science is for boys.”

This average still exists today, according to Dr Anne-Marie Imafidon MBE, co-founder of STEMettes, the award-winning social action alarming the next bearing of girls into STEM. In a recent TNW Answers session, Imafidon said: “We can get rid of it by arduous it when we hear and see it, with the examples of role models and the bags of women who do science and maths everyday. We also can claiming it with the accomplishment stats that show girls beat boys across science and maths qualifications.”

Read next: A new hack uses lasers to send aside commands to your Amazon Echo