Artificial intelligence promises to accommodate every facet of technology from healthcare to space exploration. Simply put: all technology in the year 2020 and beyond is AI technology. But, what if making aggregate better absolutely makes aggregate worse?

Wall-E affection (not a real thing) describes the fear of a future dystopia inhabited by absent people who are absolutely codicillary on technology to accomplish even the simplest of tasks. The idea here is that AI-powered machines will attend our every need to such a degree that we become more like cows being herded than humans living freely.

This clip from the movie demonstrates what this could look like:

You don’t have to look very far to find affirmation that lends acceptance to this prophesy. How many phone numbers do you know by heart? Can you bethink all your accessories if you’re about after access to a screen? How would you go about award out, for example, who the administrator of cinematography was for the first Saw film?

Without our accepted AI – Google Search and Amazon Alexa, and so on – we might start to feel a little unwise or uneducated. “Google it” has always afflicted our society. But does that mean we’re on the path to abiding applesauce and laziness?


Some experts posit that once we’re freed from the burden of developing new technology to deal with our challenges, our breed will intellectually regress. If AI takes over the burden of analytic our problems, conceivably we’ll lose our keen edge.

This theory isn’t accurate by history, however. The admeasurement of the auto didn’t put people in the busline industry out of business, it put horse-drawn buggies out of business over a period abiding nearly a century. There’s a strong altercation that humans will always have problems to solve.

We should feel almost safe in bold that were we to end up in some post-apocalyptic world where Google Search didn’t exist, a few of us would still know how to read, write, and convey information. Search isn’t a crutch, it’s a tool like fire.

However, as we’ve seen with fire, AI has the abeyant to get out of control. What happens when we conflate “misaligned objectives” and Wall-E syndrome? What if AI gets so good at befitting us happy and advantageous that we absolutely miss the point of no return.

The people in the above video from the movie sure do look happy. If we toss aside the yucky and credible attack to make blubber look like the result of laziness, it’s not hard to brainstorm people made advantageous by AI-guided alone diet and medication drooling their way through a abject existence.

Our robot overlords could rule us all after killing a single person. In fact, if we’re daydreaming, it’s achievable that a competent archive of algorithms with our total trust could extend our lives, eradicate our diseases, and make way better TV shows and movies than annihilation on this year’s absolution agenda – all the while, herding us to our closing extinction.

Will the rise of all-powerful AI lead to a species-wide corruption for humanity? Evolution theory tells us that it won’t. But, Charles Darwin, the father of evolutionary theory, didn’t always get aggregate right.

Read next: How to add people to Twitter lists after advice them