The latest technology and digital news on the web

Gadgets for humans

The $2.6B Escobar vs. Apple accusation — here’s what the experts have to say

In a year of antic stories, Roberto Escobar (brother of the somewhat abominable Pablo) suing Apple for $2.6 billion is one of the best.

Thing is, while we have the strong suspicion this is a annihilation but a publicity stunt for Escobar Inc., we don’t know this for certain. Especially now it looks like Apple will absolutely have to deal with this accusation head on.

There was only one course of action: talk to a range of law professionals and work out if the case is just a big bleared turd. So that’s what we did.

Escobar vs. Apple: what the experts think

To summarize, the Escobar vs. Apple case revolves around a FaceTime aegis issue in Roberto’s iPhone X. He alleges this eventually led to his life being endangered, as the breach accustomed hackers to get his home abode and send him a aggressive letter, causing him mental anguish.

The above is split up into three causes of action: “Breach of Contract,” “Negligence/Negligence Misrepresentation,” and “Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.”

The first part of the accusation — the Breach of Arrangement area — covers Escobar being sold a device that an Apple reseller assured him couldn’t “be exploited” and wouldn’t be “vulnerable to future exploits,” article that eventually happened.

On this, Attila Tomaschek — a agenda aloofness expert at ProPrivacy — told me that although manufacturers can acceding they’re doing all they can to secure devices, suggesting article is “fully adequate adjoin alien future threats is a bit absurd.”

Justin Sterling — the architect and Principal Advocate of The Sterling Firm — came in from a altered angle.

He said that this complaint is based on an oral acceding amid Escobar and the Apple reseller. If it’s going to progress, Roberto will need to accommodate “sufficient evidence,” article that’s difficult to do when there’s no documentation.

Essentially, Sterling said this part of the case is a “he-said-she-said” situation, and that’ll make it a tough sell to the court.

Now, onto the second part of Escobar vs. Apple case: his complaint of “Negligence/Negligent Misrepresentation.” In summary, this area claims that Apple should’ve notified Escobar about the above FaceTime aegis issue.

Tomaschek states that although it took Apple nine days after the analysis of the bug to patch it, the aggregation did “take action and [publicly acknowledge] and [resolve] the issue.”

He also acicular out the accompaniment of accepting a aggressive letter on January 19, 2019, the same day the FaceTime bug was discovered. Article that’s “a bit convenient” and “suspect.”

Finally, the third cause of action in the Escobar vs. Apple accusation is Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, article Tomaschek calls “particularly rich.”

The core aspect is that Roberto Escobar believes the iPhone aegis breach put him through mental anguish, acceptation he had to spend more money on clandestine security. Tomaschek believes this has more to do with “his captivation in … the Medellín drug cartel” than “Apple affairs him an iPhone.”


Now we come to crux of the matter: does Roberto Escobar have any chance of acceptable this case adjoin Apple?

Braden Perry — a litigation, regulatory, and government investigations advocate with Kennyhertz Perry, LLC — doesn’t think so. He believes this is “a difficult case to prove for Escobar,” mainly down to the lack of accounting affirmation around the claim he was affirmed a absolutely secure iPhone X.

Sterling doesn’t think Escobar has a chance either.

He does accept Roberto should’ve “also asserted a cause of action for aggression of privacy” to help his case, but said that it’ll be tricky to “provide enough affirmation to abutment his causes of accomplishments for Breach of Arrangement and Negligence.”

This doesn’t mean aggregate will be rosy for Apple though.

We’ve already covered Escobar abstinent Apple’s appeal for a 30 day addendum of this case, and Perry told me that the aggregation is in a “tricky spot.”

He said that if it dismisses the case too early, the judge will take Escobar’s allegations as true and “determine if there are colorable claims.” This means the Escobar vs. Apple case will have to be “either bound amid the parties or absitively on its merits.”

And what does Perry thing will eventually happen? Well, he thinks it’ll “garner publicity and legal costs for Apple,” and the parties will likely “settle before trial.” Which could mean some cash for Escobar.

Other experts were less absolute about his chances.

David Reischer— Attorney & CEO of — didn’t mince his words, saying “this is a barmy accusation … based on weak arrangement and tort causes of action that have no actual merit.”

He finalizes this account by saying it’s highly absurd “any court of competent administration would ever find that Apple breached a duty of care to Escobar.”


Tomaschek also had some choice words apropos the case. He told me the entire adventure is “a piece of showmanship advised to drum up a bit of publicity.” Which is pretty close to what we said when we first covered this case.

Maybe we know law after all.

For more gear, gadget, and accouterments news and reviews, follow Plugged on Cheep and Flipboard.

Published June 25, 2020 — 10:02 UTC

Hottest related news