The latest technology and digital news on the web

Human-centric AI news and analysis

A beginner’s guide to the AI apocalypse: Altruism joins the hivemind

It’s pretty easy to think up new ways for robots to abort us. We’re pretty squishy. But what if AI doesn’t want us dead? Maybe our future overlords will see our weaknesses and, in their absolute benevolence, choose to advancement us. Conceivably altruism goes abolished through change instead of extermination.

Welcome to the . Your every anticipation is also anybody else’s every thought. You share a single ability with the entire world. There’s no aberration amid you, the other people on the planet, a ‘smart’ garage door-opener, and the computers that ascendancy us all. You exist as an addendum of , one tiny but important piece of a greater being – you’re kind of like a toenail cell or a sphincter muscle.

The idea of an AI-powered hivemind that angrily inducts acquainted creatures is a science fiction trope born out of existential fear. The big idea is that we’ll assuredly build a accepted AI (GAI) with above intelligence to humans and it’ll figure out how to make us all cyborgs that affix anon to the mother server (or whatever the bots call it).

Credit: Star Trek: The Next Generation
Captain Picard’s less than agreeable cyborg experience.

As to why it would do this, that’s anybody’s guess. Maybe it pities us and wants to take care of us. We’re a violent, self-destructive breed that could acutely use some adult supervision. If an AI were to become assertive of the adherence of human life, it would make sense it would want to jam a brain computer interface (BCI) into our skulls so that it could fix our source code.

Maybe it won’t be a affable AI that converts us over to the ultimate social network. Conceivably we’ll let loose a adverse GAI who, after scanning YouTube for about 90 seconds, determines we’re a lost cause and decides to rule us through hive subjugation.

If you’re picturing the alien Borg breed from Star Trek, you’re in the right ballpark but lets assume our mother server is a earthbound design. Rather than losing a battle for altruism in a war with evil robot-persons from addition galaxy, the smart money says we’ll be the architects of our own demise.

Facebook and Neuralink (an Elon Musk startup) are both alive on BCIs and GAIs. Think about that for a second. Two companies with around absolute allotment are accompanying alive on projects to create acquainted machines interface human brains to computers.

And we still haven’t even sorted out how the human brain functions. Our amoebic neural network’s intricate chicane remain a abstruseness to even the most accomplished scientists of our species. What happens when we give a clever AI access to our full brain network? There’s a better than zero chance it’ll crack our code and figure out how to fire every alone neuron in our brain like the aqueduct of a massive orchestra.

Of course, we can take a deep breath and let out a sigh of relief because the experts at Facebook, Neuralink, and all the other billion and abundance dollar companies trying to solve GAI are boilerplate near bearing a acquainted computer intelligence. And that means we can adapt and pass regulations and come up with software checks and accouterments limitations to ensure AI never gains ascendancy of our minds.

But maybe we won’t. Some scientists fear we’re to stop the assured rise of the machines. AI expert Lance Eliot, a former Stanford professor, afresh appear an commodity bond COVID-19, Neanderthal DNA, and self-driving cars to the closing hivemind takeover of the human race by superintelligent robots.

Eliot wrote about a recent study assuming that, conceivably due to hidden Neanderthal DNA, some people are more affected to COVID-19. This isn’t as alien as it may sound on the surface, in fact there’s belief that hidden DNA appearance could be amenable for a lot of the human condition. This study has yet to be peer-reviewed, but if it pans out it could go a long way toward answer why some people seem to be more affected to COVID-19 than others.

He then takes this a step added and explains that these hidden “DNA triggers,” don’t necessarily have to be acted upon by a ache or result in a physiological response. They could, for instance, be affronted by celebratory commodity novel and lead to a cerebral result.

Eliot writes:

You wake up one morning and see some self-driving cars canoeing around your neighborhood.

This is admirable and you smile from ear to ear, admiring to see them.

Is your acknowledgment due to logically and rationally having accustomed at such a conclusion, or might a ambuscade part of your Neanderthal brood DNA be triggering you to gladly accept the AI and be foolishly dispatch you to blithely acceptable these new AI-based intruders?

This is absolutely a lot of belief – Eliot even goes on to wonder whether today’s political divide could be attributed to DNA triggers. But there’s some actuality there. Many of us do wonder “what the hell is wrong” with people who fundamentally disagree with us on what appears to be an obviously-one-sided topic.

Why are some people fundamentally against to the idea of “cyborgs,” and others inexplicably aflame by it? The easy answer is because we’re rational, anxious creatures able of chief how we feel about commodity after the need for some sort of actinic cabal to explain our differences.

But the hard answer, the one we might have to worry about one day, is that no matter what there will always be a cogent allotment of the citizenry with a predisposition appear self-destructive behavior. The fact that the world’s governments are currently in ascendancy of enough nuclear ammunition to abuse human afterlife tells us absolutely how much we’re accommodating to risk for a atom of power.

This tells us that when the machines induct us, it apparently won’t be through force. Facebook, YouTube, and Cheep aren’t banishment us to use them and we’re absolutely inducted. In fact we’re paying for the advantage in mental health and data. Think about how much damage we’re collectively doing to our brains just for the dopamine hit that comes from accepting absorption online.

[Read: ]

No, affairs are, all the machines will need to absolutely boss our breed is the acquiescent offer of power and control.

When the hivemind comes it won’t point a apparatus gun at you, it’ll offer you paradise and say “install this new chip in your brain and you’ll never feel pain, sorrow, or fear again.” Altruism isn’t able for that kind of fight.

Appear July 27, 2020 — 19:05 UTC

Hottest related news