The latest technology and digital news on the web

Human-centric AI news and analysis

Tech helped fight COVID-19 in the short term — but it might backlash in the long term

Among all the things that have proven to be broken and disregarded or underestimated because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and amid all the industries and niches that came to a halt, technology acceptance was the exception.

While simple (and old) measures such as quarantines, social distancing, abrasion hands, and cutting masks were still the most effective, our modern association wanted to give a modern answer to the virus.

Thus, the communicable became an accelerator for the more boundless use of technology — Zoom affairs and home deliveries became more prevalent, as some even tried it for the first time after the outbreak.

But as these solutions solved our urgent needs, they were not always ready for the task. What awaits us down the road, and how should we prepare?

A shift in habits

With people blockage at home, calls for abutment and abetment added dramatically. According to Raj Koneru, the CEO and architect of the communicative belvedere Kore.ai, “There has been a spike of 30-40 percent in calls, the burden of which simply fell on agents who have been forced to work remotely.”

Call centers were among the most disrupted jobs. Offices accordingly had to shrink, as the awash spaces became epicenters of outbreaks. Lower operational budgets also forced companies to reduce their staff. However, the chump calls had seen a huge uptick, which appropriate more operators. To solve this, companies started axis to bogus intelligence.

Virtual Administration (or AI-powered agents) started to take over calls and alter operators. While not as smart as their human counterparts, they were still able to take on a cogent allocation of the simpler and banal calls, absolution the operators for more arduous tasks.

This was even good for the operators; call center operators have a very demanding job with one of the accomplished churn rates. The alteration meant they would face less stress and pressure, and less aggravation from angry customers. “By breach accidental calls, enabling swift responses to basic questions and accouterment the advisers with the right kind of ability and skills, AI solutions are eliminating monotony, drudgery, and inefficiency,” explained Koneru.

AI-based agreeable balance was addition additional project. Though the technology was still not ready, big tech companies accordingly put it in use to deal with a bare minimum as the operators were sent home. Agreeable balance is also one of those tasks better left off to the robots, as the difficult alive altitude have caused moderators PSDT and sometimes even heart attacks. The technology was not ready though.

The use of robots also witnessed a surge, decidedly in hospitals, hotels, and restaurants. Here, the aim was to create safer environments and accomplish concrete distancing.

Technology was also used to anon fight the coronavirus and find a vaccine; acquaintance archetype apps were developed, and AI was used in our medical analysis for a cure.

Lurking problems

Technology has solved our urgent needs to some extent, but we had to make compromises. For instance, acquaintance archetype apps would never make it to people’s phones if it were not for the pandemic, because of grave aloofness infringements. Just a few months before the pandemic, the showed how tracking people’s area can reveal their identity.

Another archetype is Zoom; the technology had not been tested to this scale before and became a hacking target. However, the aggregation took measures to access aegis and aloofness for all users.

But conceivably the most important (and overlooked) factor are the people that are being replaced; at a time where unemployment is at all-times-high and mental health problems from long stay-at-homes are increasing, losing jobs only makes the matter worse.

A amenable approach

Some jobs, decidedly those that put people’s lives in danger or accommodation their mental health, are better off replaced. And we cannot expect companies not to make the most use of technology, because otherwise, a more avant-garde adversary might wipe them out.

However, we must learn that a company’s acceptable card is not its tech — it is the employees. Because the profits gained from hours saved can be minimal, compared to a more advantageous worker. More alive hours does not necessarily construe to better results.

On the contrary, analysis has shown advisers are more advantageous with less alive hours. Microsoft tried a four-day workweek, and the after-effects assertive the tech behemoth to abide with that model: Not only where the advisers happier, but the abundance had added by 40%.

This is a game of qualities, not quantities. By now, we have abstruse that the “move fast and break things” access causes more problems than it solves down the road. Companies must think for the long term and not just take care of their business but their workers as well. “We cannot deny that assertive jobs will absolutely be fully replaced,” accepted Raj Koneru, whose aggregation offers basic assistants. “In our view, companies should focus on reskilling their advisers rather than replacing them. At times it helps organizations to ascertain the hidden talents within the workforce on how they add value with their skills.”

This commodity was originally appear by on TechTalks, a advertisement that examines trends in technology, how they affect the way we live and do business, and the problems they solve. But we also altercate the evil side of technology, the darker implications of new tech and what we need to look out for. You can read the aboriginal commodity here.

Appear August 5, 2020 — 07:59 UTC

Hottest related news

No articles found on this category.