The latest technology and digital news on the web

Human-centric AI news and analysis

Australia wants AI to handle divorces — here’s why

An online app called Amica is now using bogus intelligence to help amid couples make parenting arrange and divide their assets.

For many people, the coronavirus communicable has put even the arch of relationships to the test. A May survey conducted by Relationships Australia found 42% of 739 respondents accomplished a abrogating change in their accord with their accomplice under lockdown restrictions.

There has also been a surge in the number of couples gluttonous break advice. The Australian government has backed the use of Amica for those in such circumstances. The chatbot uses bogus intelligence (AI) to make suggestions for how agreeable couples can divide their money and acreage based on their circumstances.

But although such tools offer advantages such as accessibility and bargain affecting distress, their applications remain limited. And over-relying on them could be a glace slope.

How it works

According to Amica’s website, it “considers legal attempt and applies them to your circumstances”. In other words, the software draws on mass data (collected and anchored by its designers) from agnate past cases to make suggestions to users.

Amica demonstrates AI’s abeyant in analytic legal problems in family disputes. Interestingly, it’s not the only tool of this kind in the legal field. There are a range of AI-powered family legal casework used in Australia, including Penda and Adieu.

Penda aims to help victims of family abandon by accouterment free legal and safety information. Its AI chatbot provides online legal advice and advice after acute a contiguous affair with a lawyer.

Adieu enables couples to accomplish accordant banking and parenting agreements via its AI chatbot basic “Lumi”, which can refer couples to mediators, counsellors, attorneys or banking admiral if required. Lumi also has a one-click acknowledgment tool advised to save time and money by using AI to assay the banking annal of both users.

Advantages of legal AI tools

Australia’s family law system is overburdened, consistent in long delays for families in the court system. Court affairs are also expensive, and circuitous family law cases can cost each party more than A$200,000.

AI tools such as Amica and Adieu enable couples to boldness problems themselves and avoid the slow and big-ticket court process. This is abnormally true for couples who have commenced or are because the break action now, amid coronavirus restrictions.

Our appraisal of Adieu circuitous reviewing abstract on amends apps and interviewing professionals including mediators, attorneys and banking advisers. We also surveyed 37 Adieu users to find out who would use such an app and how adequate people were with them.

We found by giving couples ascendancy over the break process, they were less likely to be emotionally stressed. Although our survey sample was almost small, 76% of participants appear not activity affecting distress. Of those who did, most said this was the result of absolute circumstances.

One actor said:

I’m pretty new to apps but am learning. They’re not so bad, but don’t really alter people. On the plus side, they’re aloof and don’t judge you!

Disadvantages and limitations

Despite a number of advantages, AI tools for clearing legal disputes (much like many other AI tools) come with setbacks.

For instance, they’re not accessible in many cases. Amica’s designers highlight the belvedere is only acceptable for “amicable” amid couples with no circuitous situations involved, such as family violence. This is because at its accepted development level, AI-powered chatbots can only accomplish a almost simple acknowledgment from the advice they’re given.

According to a 2016 survey by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, around 5.8 actor Australians had accomplished concrete or affecting abuse from a partner.

Further, Australian courts are appropriate to accede each child’s best interests when chief on a family case. There are accepted apropos that parenting and banking suggestions from AI-powered tools may ignore the needs of children, and only reflect the interests of parents.

There are also apropos around the use of AI in legal family cases more generally. For example, access to online platforms requires a assertive amount of agenda articulacy and accessibility.

This disadvantages people after access to the internet, a smartphone or computer. Also, people may not have the abstruse skills needed to use apps such as Amica or Adieu.

A attenuated past

Apart from family disputes, AI has also been controversially used in bent cases for sentencing purpose. The COMPAS tool has come under fire on abundant occasions for its use in the US. Its risk appraisal algorithms allegedly adumbrate how likely a bent is to reoffend.

Australia’s robodebt saga also showed how AI can accord to ambiguous authoritative accommodation making. In that debacle, abundance payments made on the basis of self-reported fortnightly income were cross-referenced adjoin an estimated income, taken as an boilerplate of annual balance appear to the Australian Tax Office. This was then used to auto-generate debt notices after human checks.

It’s clear AI comes with the abeyant for anchored bias. As the use of AI-powered technology continues for affairs commonly handled in the courts, a government action such as the European Commission’s AI White Paper is needed to abode the accepted challenges.

Along with this, an ethical framework with input from Australia’s legal industry should affirm AI use in the legal sector.

Published October 10, 2020 — 11:00 UTC

Hottest related news