The latest technology and digital news on the web

Human-centric AI news and analysis

DeepMind’s ascent losses show why it’s hard to run an AI analysis lab

Last week, on the heels of DeepMind’s beforehand in using bogus intelligence to adumbrate protein folding came the news that the UK-based AI aggregation is still costing its parent aggregation Alphabet Inc hundreds of millions of dollars in losses each year.

A tech aggregation losing money is annihilation new. The tech industry is abounding with examples of companies who burned broker money long before acceptable profitable. But DeepMind is not a normal aggregation gluttonous to grab a share of a specific market. It is an AI analysis lab that has had to repurpose itself into a semi-commercial outfit to ensure its survival.

And while its owner, which is also the parent aggregation of Google, is currently happy with basement the bill for DeepMind’s big-ticket AI research, it is not affirmed that it will abide to do so forever.

DeepMind’s profits and losses

DeepMind AlphaFold
DeepMind’s AlphaFold activity used bogus intelligence to help beforehand the complicated claiming of protein folding.

According to its annual report filed with the UK’s Companies House register, DeepMind has more than angled its revenue, raking in £266 actor in 2019, up from £103 actor in 2018. But the company’s costs abide to grow as well, accretion from £568 actor in 2018 to £717 in 2019. The all-embracing losses of the aggregation grew from £470 actor in 2018 to £477 actor in 2019.

At first glance, this isn’t bad news. Compared to the antecedent years, DeepMind’s acquirement growth is accelerating while its losses are plateauing.

deepmind acquirement and losses
DeepMind’s acquirement and losses from 2016 to 2019

But the report contains a few more cogent facts. The certificate mentions “Turnover analysis and development accomplishment from other group undertakings.” This means DeepMind’s main chump is its owner. Alphabet is paying DeepMind to apply its AI analysis and talent to Google’s casework and infrastructure. In the past, Google has used DeepMind’s casework for tasks such as managing the power grid of its data centers and convalescent the AI of its voice assistant.

What this also means that there isn’t yet a market for DeepMind’s AI, and if there is, it will only be accessible through Google.

The certificate also mentions that the growth of costs “mainly relates to a rise in abstruse infrastructure, staff costs, and other accompanying charges.”

This is an important point. DeepMind’s “technical infrastructure” runs mainly on Google’s huge cloud casework and its appropriate AI processors, the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU). DeepMind’s main area of analysis is deep accretion learning, which requires access to very big-ticket compute resources. Some of the company’s projects in 2019 included work on an AI system that played StarCraft 2 and addition that played Quake 3, both of which cost millions of dollars in training.

A agent for DeepMind told the media that the costs mentioned in the certificate also included work on the AlphaFold, the company’s acclaimed protein-folding AI, addition very big-ticket project.

There are no public capacity on how much Google accuse DeepMind for access to its cloud AI services, but it is most likely renting its TPUs at a discount. This means that after the abutment and abetment of Google, the company’s costs would have been much higher.

Staff costs is addition important issue. While accord in apparatus acquirements courses has added in the past few years, scientists that can engage in the kind of cutting-edge AI analysis DeepMind is complex in are very scarce. And by some accounts, top AI talent command seven-digit salaries.

The growing absorption in deep learning and its account to bartering settings has created an arms race amid tech companies to access top AI talent. Most of the industry’s top AI scientists and antecedents are alive either full- or half-time at large companies such as Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft. The fierce antagonism for abduction top AI talent has had two consequences. First, like every other field where supply doesn’t meet demand, it has resulted in a steep acclivity in the salaries of AI scientists. And second, it has driven many AI scientists from bookish institutions that can’t afford arch salaries to affluent tech companies that can. Some scientists abide to stay in academia for the sake of continuing accurate research, but they are too few and far between.

And after the abetment of a large tech aggregation like Google, analysis labs like DeepMind can’t afford to hire new advisers for their projects.

So, while DeepMind shows signs of slowly axis around its losses, its growth has made it even more abased on Google’s banking assets and large cloud infrastructure.

Google is still annoyed with DeepMind

DeepMind AlphaStar
DeepMind’s developed an AI system called AlphaStar that can beat the best players at the real-time action game StarCraft 2

According to DeepMind’s annual report, Google Ireland Holdings Unlimited, one of the beforehand branches of Alphabet, “waived the claim of intercompany loans and all accrued absorption amounting to £1.1 billion.”

DeepMind has also accustomed accounting assurances from Google that it will “continue to accommodate able banking support” to the AI firm for “a period of at least twelve months.”

For the time being, Google seems to be annoyed with the beforehand DeepMind has made, which is also reflected in animadversion made by Google and Alphabet executives.

In July’s annual antithesis call with investors and analysts, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said, “I’m very happy with the pace at which our R&D on AI is progressing. And for me, it’s important that we are advanced as a company, and we are leading. And to me, I’m aflame at the pace at which our engineering and R&D teams are alive both across Google and DeepMind.”

But the accumulated world and accurate analysis move at altered paces.

Scientific analysis is abstinent in decades. Much of the AI technology used today in bartering applications has been in the making since the 1970s and 1980s. Likewise, a lot of the cutting-edge analysis and techniques presented at AI conferences today will apparently not find their way into the mass market in the coming years. DeepMind’s ultimate goal, developing artificial accepted intelligence (AGI), is by the most optimistic estimates at least decades away.

On the other hand, the backbone of shareholders and investors is abstinent in months and years. Companies that can’t turn over a profit in years or at least show hopeful signs of growth fall afoul of investors. DeepMind currently has none of those. It doesn’t have assessable growth, because its only client is Google itself. And it’s not clear when—if ever— some of its technology will be ready for commercialization.

sundar pichai
Google CEO Sundar Pichai is annoyed with the pace of AI analysis and development at DeepMind

And here’s where DeepMind’s bind lies. At heart, it is a analysis lab that wants to push the limits and of science and make sure advances in AI are benign to all humans. Its owner’s goal, however, is to build articles that solve specific problems and turn in profits. The two goals are diametrically opposed, affairs DeepMind in two altered directions: advancement its accurate nature or transforming into a product-making AI company. The company has already had trouble finding antithesis accurate analysis and artefact development in the past.

And DeepMind is not alone. OpenAI, DeepMind’s absolute rival, has been facing a agnate character crisis, transforming from an AI analysis lab to a Microsoft-backed for-profit aggregation that rents its deep acquirements models.

Therefore, while DeepMind doesn’t need to worry about its barren analysis yet, but as it becomes more and more affected in the accumulated dynamics of its owner, it should think deeply about its future and the future of accurate AI research.

This commodity was originally appear by Ben Dickson on TechTalks, a advertisement that examines trends in technology, how they affect the way we live and do business, and the problems they solve. But we also altercate the evil side of technology, the darker implications of new tech and what we need to look out for. You can read the aboriginal commodity here.

Appear January 12, 2021 — 09:54 UTC

Hottest related news

No articles found on this category.
No articles found on this category.