The latest technology and digital news on the web

Human-centric AI news and analysis

How long until ‘digital humans’ take over dating apps?

In the early months of the COVID-19 shelter-in-place, Cathy Gover joined the dating website Plenty of Fish. Like many people during the pandemic, the Tennessee widow was adversity from the onset of lockdown bareness and absitively to look for love online. It wasn’t long before she met Marc from Atlanta, and fell for his ample charms. Then, six weeks into their online romance, Marc asked Cathy for banking help.

Of course, you’ve heard this story many, many times before. An older woman attractive for love and accompaniment meets a predator posing as a lonely heart, only to be duped out of bags of dollars. Sometimes these cases can be frustrating, and leave us asking how the victim missed all the audacious red flags.

In the end, Cathy apparent that the pictures Marc had sent her were absolutely of a Brazilian pastor. But not before he had adequate her of a cool $3,000 and badly damaged her faith in humankind and, of course, her abject hopes of award love again.

With just a few stolen photographs and a six-week “love bomb” operation, this fraudster was able to abstract a cogent amount of cash from Cathy and he (if it even was a he) has no doubt done the same thing to scores of others. Now, just brainstorm how many more he could fool if he was able to create hundreds of original, convincing, and alternate identities at the click of a button.

This scary anticipation isn’t as far off as you might think.

Enter the MetaHumans. High-fidelity agenda humans that can be created “in minutes” with the help of a new tool from Epic Games — the MetaHuman Creator — that promises to “.”

Though not yet perfect, these agenda creations are still pretty astonishing and authenticate just how far this kind of technology has come.

Obviously, Epic’s primary admirers for this absorbing tool is creators in the gaming, movie, and wider ball industries, and we can only brainstorm what absurd adventures they will use to create, but we also shouldn’t rule out its awful use. Particularly in this new, more basic world that often relies on remote video advice more heavily than in-person interaction.

As a breed that has thus far acquired to trust our senses, but we need to slowly balloon the idea that “seeing is believing.” At the same time, more austere anticipation should go into how we get ahead of a future in which legions of these MetaHumans (and their equivalents) are unleashed online to mislead and bamboozle those who cannot analyze them as fakes.

But even if governments were able to adapt in a way that would block or deter the weaponization of this technology (which seems unlikely), we should also take pause to think about how we feel about the legitimate, cellophane use of these phony humans alfresco of the narrow world of movies and video games.

Might they alter humans in commercials, or even in the classroom? Would you have one read your kids a bedtime story? Could they model clothes after benumbed up on basic runways, or host the next online appointment you attend after a hitch? There are many possibilities, but each heralds the back-up of a real human being. It makes you wonder why we are so hell-bent on creating tech in our own image when it could be the ultimate act of self-sabotage…

Even if we choose to abolish as fantasy the idea that agenda humans will access our daily lives in the near-term, we should not discount that for much adolescent ancestors concepts like this — along with fake news and deepfakes and tech like GPT-3 —  be part of their compassionate of the world. They are altogether less “creeped out” by AI, and its creations, and more likely to engage with bots in all guises. As such, we have a real albatross to think about how we want these tools to be deployed and which lines we should anticipate them from crossing… even if it does all feel a little .

Appear February 18, 2021 — 11:55 UTC

Hottest related news

No articles found on this category.