Calling the EU’s new border ascendancy AI a “lie detector” is like calling Brexit a minor altercation among friends.

The abhorrent is that the EU is testing a pilot affairs for all-embracing airports featuring a apparatus learning-based “lie detector.” CNN broke the story last week in its commodity “Passengers to face AI lie detector tests at EU airports.”

According to the report (and the project’s website) the EU is testing a pilot affairs involving AI that uses an avatar to ask people questions. Supposedly this AI-powered assemble knows if a person is being accurate when they answer, and it flags those it determines aren’t. Once addition is labeled a liar, human agents are summoned to investigate further.

Depending on your views on aloofness and immigration, this is either music to your ears or the alpha of a dystopian future beeline out of an Orwellian nightmare. You’re wrong either way.

For example, if you’re cerebration “we could just have it ask anybody “are you a terrorist?” and make the EU safer for everyone” then you’re apparently bold there’s such a thing as an AI lie detector. There isn’t. Don’t worry, that’s a common mistake.

Like all lie detectors, AI-based solutions rely on accidental guesses with whatever the government considers a tolerable level error. A polygraph, for example, is declared to have amid a 75 and 90 percent accurateness rating. It doesn’t detect lies, it detects the subtle cues associated with lying. Just like this, AI doesn’t detect lies either. It detects biometric indicators associated with lying — at around 76 percent success, allegedly.

But, on the other hand, if you’re cerebration that this is the most arrant abuse of human rights in an airport since the days when TSA agents in the US were instructed to contour Muslims, you’re wrong too. Mostly, anyway: it goes far beyond just hassling foreigners at airports.

The “lie detector,” is just the tip of the iceberg. What you need to know is that, in this case, “lie detection” is short hand for “data collection.”

The EU’s new airport activity isn’t called “operation lie detector.” It’s called “iBorderCtrl.” And “lie detection” is just a allocation of what it does. Here’s an image from the project’s website:

webrok

First, let’s start with the lie apprehension module: Automatic Deception Apprehension System (ADDS)*. The asterix is from the iBorderCtrl website, TNW didn’t add that. Before you read about what ADDS does, the people architecture it are accountable to point out the following:

*ADDS is based on antecedent developments, alleged Silent Talker [1][2]. The activity has adopted this technology and is well aware about the altercation around it. This tool has undergone the afterward steps: A accurate foundation is accomplished when a analysis starts from a position of benightedness and follows the accurate method to dispel that ignorance. As scientists of AI, one accurate analysis catechism is “Are there non-verbal behavioural indicators of deception” and the abstracts agitated out accumulated data to abutment or refute the accordant hypotheses.

Basically the activity acknowledges, but doesn’t care about, altercation surrounding the use of AI for “lie detection.”

The rest of the account for ADDS is full of the old “non-verbal cues” argument. It’s academically interesting, but absolutely not the insane advance we’d need for AI to become a bonafide lie detector. As such, shame on any government for because it at this point.

But ADDS is the silly unimportant part of iBorderCTRL. It’s the fake monster confusing you from the cold, affected data accumulating that’s really occurring. Basically, ADDS is below fruit for pundits to point at and stoke conversations on what capabilities AI really has. Meanwhile, if I can digest The Ragin’ Cajun: “It’s the data, stupid.”

In reality, the rest of the iBorderCtrl suite is what’s scary. ADDS is much like the “personality profile” that Cambridge Analytica used to argue people to give up their data. After all, why wouldn’t you agree to take a lie detector if you have annihilation to hide?

The answer is that you have plenty to hide, whether you’re lying or not.

Here’s what else iBorderCtrl does:

  • Compiles a full facial contour using video and photographs
  • Scrapes and scours all of your social media accounts
  • Document and signature analysis
  • Creates and stores your agenda voice print
  • Risk appraisal based on accumulated data
  • Searches for hidden humans

Let’s grab the last one for assay real quick. Searches for hidden humans? At an airport? Unlikely. This, according to the project’s literature, does look for people hiding. But it’s acutely accessible this is advised for border crossings where mobile agents are tracking or analytic for people in alfresco surroundings, not airports. Still, it’s part of the airport “lie detector” you’re audition so much about.

Simply put: iBorderCtrl is a absolute data accumulating and surveillance amalgamation that appears to be more robust than the one Trump’s put in use at the US/Mexico border.

The amount of advice the EU could glean from this – aggregate alignment from a person’s sexual character to religious and political behavior – would allow it target individuals by amalgamation with laser precision.

But that’s only a botheration if you don’t accept in biased data, base government, or pie-in-the-sky AI promises.

Read next: Killing a suffragette in Red Dead Redemption 2 says more about you than Rockstar