Last night, The Guardian and Banking Times appear letters citing it’s “highly probable” that Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (aka MBS), played a key role in hacking Amazon co-founder Jeff Bezos’ phone in 2018. The hack shows how easy it is to get ascendancy of a top executive’s data. But we’ll get to that later, let’s first look at the history and alignment behind the hack.

An encrypted video file sent by the prince to Bezos on WhatsApp accustomed the phone to be hacked. Experts at FTI Consulting, a business advising firm that led the argumentative analysis of the Amazon chief’s phone said, “a massive and crooked beat of data from Bezos’s phone began, continuing and ascent for months” hours after the file was sent.

Bezos and bin Salman met at a dinner in Los Angeles in 2018, and exchanged numbers. Soon after that, they had a falling out as Saudi Arabia murdered adept announcer Jamal Khashoggi, who also used to write for Bezos-owned Washington Post.

Last year, National Enquirer, an American tabloid, appear affectionate capacity of Bezos’ extramarital affair through a dump of data from the executive’s phone. Later, Bezos’ head of security, Gavin de Becker wrote a column in the Daily Beast alleging that Saudis had access to the Amazon co-founder’s phone and data.

There’s no acceptance as of now, but it’s highly likely that Saudi’s used the belled Pegasus software, created by the Israel-based NSO group, to get the data from Bezos’ phone.

Last year, WhatsApp sued NSO Group for concern on over 1,400 individuals, including journalists and activists across the world, using its Pegasus software. While the Israel-based aggregation denied the allegations, assorted investigations, including Khashoggi’s murder case, found that victims had the software amid in their phones through assorted means.

As I said earlier, this goes to show how easy it is to target even top-level people, and that they need to advance their aegis practices. Bezos’ phone was hacked and he had to endure claimed and banking loss as he kept his alone and business data on the same phone. In 2017, it was appear that US President Donald Trump used a five-year-old Samsung phone with anachronous software.

Last year, CNN appear that Trump connected using a claimed phone admitting several warnings from aegis officials. In 2016, it was found that Mark Zuckerberg used ‘dadada’ as the countersign of several social networks.

Read next: Data administration is key to an AI-driven medical anarchy