The past few months have taught us an important lesson: We’re bad at administration highly catching diseases. The Earth’s growing citizenry and the ease with which we can travel long distances have contributed to the fast spread of the novel coronavirus to more than 200 countries.

For the moment, the main catechism is, how do we stop the spread of the virus? For states, the choice is amid health and the economy. They must either shut down their economies and impose civic quarantines to anticipate the spread of COVID-19, or abide business as usual and risk infecting millions of people with the virus. Most governments have chosen the former.

But even though our lives will never return to its former state, altruism will eventually affected the coronavirus. The aftermath, however, the tragic deaths, the bread-and-butter recession, and the shock of aggregate else we’re experiencing today will face our governments with a new question: How do we stop the next pandemic? The options will then shift to allotment amid health and privacy.

We already have the tools that can help to fight the spread of diseases such as COVID-19. Mobile phones, internet of things (IoT) devices, wearables, aegis cameras powered by artificial intelligence algorithms, and other avant-garde technologies of the past decade can enable us to absolutely track every person’s location, vital signs, and health status. They can help track collocations, find out who else might have been adulterated by a patient, warn citizens about infections in their proximity, accent testing and care, manage local quarantines, and more.

With the help of technology, governments will be able to ascendancy the spread of communicable diseases after the need to shut down their entire economies and sending anybody home. Already, several countries have passed laws that are alleviation aloofness rules to allow government agencies and tech companies to abet in the fight adjoin COVID-19.

But the power of technology goes beyond that, and it can serve evil purposes as well. States such as China are already using advanced technology to openly authorize a surveillance regime with the help of large tech companies. Western governments have so far been afraid to follow suit (even though tech giants have not), and the voices of aloofness advocates have been loud enough to hold agenda Big Brother in check to some degree.

As the coronavirus communicable unfolds, aloofness advocates are adopting the alarm and admonishing adjoin solutions that breach citizens’ privacy. But with health taking a front-row seat, the agenda surveillance regime is acceptable justified and the aloofness altercation sounds less convincing.

To help abode this problem, a group of computer scientists at Boston University has proposed a band-aid that can help track catching diseases after the need for dystopian privacy-invading tools.

The absence privacy-invading option


The absence and easiest way to solve the botheration of tracking communicable diseases is to use the acceptable server-client anatomy that underlies most internet casework and applications. An appliance installed on the user’s mobile app consistently annal the person’s area and transmits the advice to a data center that stores it.

The area data can be circumscribed with other advice such as body temperature, blood pressure, and other vital signs acquired from wearable medical devices. When a person affairs COVID-19 or addition communicable disease, the server appliance queries its database for all users who might have come in acquaintance with or been in the around of the adulterated person. The server can then notify those people, acquaint them to self-quarantine, and accent them for testing. This kind of acquaintance archetype is vital to endlessly the spread of viruses.

There are many other allowances to such a system, let’s call it the “health-tracker app.” For instance, its data can be fed to machine acquirements algorithms to advance predictive models of the spread of the virus based on movement patterns. It can also warn users to avoid areas frequented by adulterated persons. Some companies have already developed AI-powered solutions that have predicted the spread of COVID-19 with arresting accuracy.

Many large tech companies are already doing location tracking—sometimes without you alive about it—for bartering purposes. But you can opt-out, avoid installing their tracking applications, use privacy-friendly alternatives, and use basic clandestine networks (VPN) or other tools that can hide your location. Not giving your area might bankrupt you of some of the acceptable appearance of those apps or crave you to pay for their services. It’s a acquainted choice you make amid aloofness and convenience.

But when installing the health-tracker app becomes law, you will be left to choose amid attention your aloofness at the cost of breaking the law or constant by the law at the cost of your privacy. Just as cartage police can stop you and ask to see your driver’s license, the health police might stop you and verify that your health-tracker app is active and is registering your location. Breaking the law can earn you a fine or maybe get you some jail time for compromising public health.

The privacy-friendly alternative


In a paper titled, “Anonymous Allocation Discovery: Harnessing Aloofness to Tame the Coronavirus,” a group of computer scientists at Boston University proposes that we don’t need to invade people’s aloofness to assure them adjoin communicable diseases. The paper provides the adapt for “an acutely simple scheme for accouterment aerial and timely alerts to users who have been in the close around of an adulterated individual.”

“The purpose of this work is to authenticate that it is accessible to promptly and anxiously notify individuals of past or present allocation with an adulterated person or surface—with only basal accommodation of alone aloofness and after advancement any database of adulterated individuals or their locations,” the advisers write.

The privacy-friendly health tracker is composed of a mobile appliance and a server. The mobile app generates a unique bearding random token at approved intervals, say every minute. Instead of sending tokens to a server, however, the appliance stores it on-device and at the same time broadcasts it through the device’s Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) component. Accessories that are within range and have the privacy-friendly health tracker installed to accept and store the tokens. These tokens comprise the device’s allocation database.

The tokens accommodate no device, location, or alone identifiable information, so autumn them on other accessories has very basal aloofness risks. The tokens are also very small in size, so the appliance should be able to annals dozens of millions after causing accumulator constraints for the device.

When a person tests absolute for COVID-19 or some other communicable disease, a medical ascendancy confirms the infection, and the app sends all the tokens it has generated to the appliance server. Again, with no device, location, or claimed advice being anchored in the tokens, the server will not be captivation any acute information. Furthermore, there’s no advice to announce whether two tokens come from the same user. “This unlinkability affiance ensures that the account cannot form a area trace of a participant’s movement patterns, thereby obviating the affair that a area trace may be affiliated to a specific person,” the advisers write.

The appliance periodically polls the server for the list of adulterated tokens and compares them adjoin its allocation database. In case of a match, the user will be warned of a accessible allocation with an adulterated person. Due to the privacy-oriented nature of the application, they will not know of the time or the area or the person with whom they have come in contact. The user can then take the all-important measures, such as consulting with medical experts for the next steps.

The authors of the paper accede that this is not a absolute solution. They write, “We accent that being in close adjacency with an adulterated person or apparent is not a absolute indicator of manual of disease: two people may be in close adjacency after transmitting the virus, or the virus may alteration through aerosols amid two parties whose allocation is afar by time. As such, the proposed ideas are advised to accompaniment (not substitute!) able blockage techniques such as social/physical distancing.”

“When accumulated with acceptable testing accommodation and absolute best practices from healthcare professionals, we hope that this may decidedly reduce the infection rate,” the advisers recommend.

What I abnormally like about the band-aid offered by the Boston University advisers is its simple and minimalist structure. I could brainstorm this appliance implemented on a wearable device, say a agenda wristband with a few gigabytes of accumulator and a BLE basic sold at a very low price. The device would not even need an internet connection, and the manual of the data of adulterated patients could be performed by a abstracted appliance installed at hospitals and testing stations. This could even advance its security, preventing bad actors from calamity servers with bad data.

Last week, Apple and Google declared work on a COVID-19 tracker mobile application that is conspicuously agnate to the one proposed by the BU researchers. But I would still prefer to see this implemented on its own barebones device that has no extra apparatus and minimizes the attack and abuse surface.

The capability of these kinds of solutions depends on their mass acceptance rate. While it charcoal to be seen how far the privacy-friendly health tracker will succeed, the work of Boston University’s advisers provides a blink of hope that we don’t need to live in a world where health will come at the cost of privacy.

Corona coverage

Read our daily advantage on how the tech industry is responding to the coronavirus and subscribe to our weekly newsletter Coronavirus in Context.