A team of neuroscientists at UCLA bygone apparent the after-effects of an agreement involving snail brains that could radically change our compassionate of how memories work. That is, if the rest of the accurate association can append its atheism long enough to give the group’s ideas austere consideration.

The scientists, led by Dr. David Glanzman, extracted RNA from the brains of Aplysia – sea slugs – and then injected it into the brain of addition Aplysia. According to the researchers’ white paper, this resulted in the about-face of memories from one animal to another:

Here, it is approved that the memory for abiding sensitization in the marine mollusk Aplysia can be auspiciously transferred by injecting RNA from sensitized into naïve animals.

Moreover, a specific cellular about-face that underlies sensitization in Aplysia, acoustic neuron hyperexcitability, can be reproduced by advertisement acoustic neurons in vitro to RNA from accomplished animals. The after-effects accommodate abutment for a nonsynaptic, epigenetic model of memory accumulator in Aplysia.

The agreement circuitous training, or sensitizing, Aplysia by abominable them. When an innocent Aplysia gets an electrical jolt for the first time it retracts its acute parts for a few seconds. But after a few shocks, once it becomes sensitized to the situation, the length of time it protects itself increases to minutes.

The advisers extracted the RNA of Aplysia which had become sensitized to the analysis and injected it into innocent Aplysia. The after-effects were that the creatures who’d never accomplished shock reacted as though they were sensitized when the scientists abashed them for the first time.

Glanzman and his team submit that this indicates memories can been transferred through RNA.

This, however, stands in action to longstanding notions of how brains form memories — through the accumulation of strong synaptic access amid neurons. Though this study isn’t the first to advance otherwise.

It all started in the 60s when an aberrant abettor at the University of Michigan, Dr. James V. McConnell, started cutting up tapeworms and agriculture them to other tapeworms. He believed that the almsman aborigine worms would gain the ability held by the deceased.

Incredibly enough his after-effects adumbrated he was right. Evidence from his study (and others since) have shown there may be some sort of transference of sensitization amid the worms.

Unfortunately for McConnell his work was often ridiculed and refuted. Some scientists said his after-effects weren’t reproducible, and others just said he was a quack. This, perhaps, is partially due to his odd sense of humor.

McConnell, a man of some wealth, created his own accurate account called “The Worm Runners Digest.” The digest was a aggregate of accepted accurate analysis and satire. On the one hand it appear real papers such as the one that showed the after-effects of his aborigine tapeworm experiment. But on the other it appear papers that were meant as jokes, such as one on how strong an black gown’s accept straps are.

It was easy for scientists and peers to abolish McConnell’s work outright. Not only did it raise ethical questions, but the science was so abolitionist that many banned to even accede its merit at all. Plus, his satire showed he wasn’t a scientist — harumph.

His work was accustomed so poorly by the accurate association that it became popularized, not for its science, but as a cautionary tale about making alien claims.

His reputation/infamy became so great that in 1985 a former apprentice at the University of Michigan (who may have never actually beyond paths with McConnell while he was teaching) named Ted Kaczynski – also known as The Unabomber – mailed him a package-bomb which exploded, consistent in injury to McConnell and a analysis assistant.

Experts accept Kaczynski was triggered by McConnell’s claims that people would one day advance their personalities and skills through the assimilation of specialty chemicals.

McConnell passed away in 1990, decades before his work would be accurate – at least partially.

Another neurosurgeon, Michael Levin, connected McConnell’s work with worms and appear a paper in 2013 which vindicated many of McConnell’s ideas about how the creatures’ memory works.

And that brings us full circle to now where, less than 24 hours after publishing, Glanzman finds his work being absolved absolute by some, admitting its absurd implications.

A report from indicates as much:

“If he’s right, this would be actually earth-shattering,” said Tomás Ryan, an abettor abettor at Trinity College Dublin, whose lab hunts for engrams, or the concrete traces of memory. “But I don’t think it’s right.”

So what would it mean if Glanzman’s team is right? If memories aren’t stored in synapses, but instead are independent in the nuclei of assertive brain cells, it would apparently be accessible to “package” memories and inject them on demand.  At least in worms and snails;  humans have brains far too circuitous to make any kind of assumptions that this work will be allusive beyond slimy things.

Whether or not McConnell, Levin, and Glanzman were/are affairs the right thread charcoal to be seen, but how our brains form memories has become one of the longest abiding biological mysteries in science.

The fact that we still haven’t ample out how worms and snails manage to bethink what little goes on their brains shows we have a long way to go in arise how memory works. Maybe now is the right time to actively amend theories absolved over half a aeon ago.

Read next: Google's Pixel Buds assuredly let you skip tracks with a double tap