The numbers for 2018 are coming in, and it appears the video game industry is accepting along just fine. The year turned out to be an alright one for the industry, and it upends predictions that the focus on revisiting older games via remasters and cornball re-releases would put a crimp on things — namely, um, my own prediction.

It’s not absolutely a secret that the video game industry has a affection for repackaging old games to re-sell them on new machines. It’s not new: I’m old enough to bethink when it was arcade games agriculture up on the Nintendo and Sega consoles. But the predilection for remasters and re-released games has spiked in the last few years as game companies have fallen on the trend with the activity of prospectors on a vein of gold — and for much the same reason. Now not only do we have video game remakes, and re-releases, we even have video game consoles being given new life.

I was the one who doomsaid the topic of gaming nostalgia. Specifically, I said it “wasn’t doing the industry any favors” and if pressed, I’d have said this is the year that the gaming industry would start activity the pinch — accurately because this trend began a few years ago and I was afraid we’d run out of things to remaster.

And I wanted to say… I was wrong, at least somewhat.

Recently the Entertainment Software Association appear capacity on game sales in the US last year, and it came out to a record-breaking $43.4 billion in revenue. Accouterments sales, acceptation consoles and accoutrements, rose by 15 percent. NPD Analyst Mat Piscatella said 2018 had “the accomplished annual tracked customer spend total since the $17.4 billion generated in 2011.”

That’s… candidly kind of staggering. I’m not commonly one to set store by sales abstracts alone, but it’s hard to ignore numbers that big. And it seemed anybody had a good year.

Even Microsoft, which posted abrogating accouterments numbers (not a surprise, given how the Xbox One always seems to play third fiddle to the PlayStation 4 and the Nintendo Switch), appear this week it’d clawed its way to an 8 percent acquirement access thanks to Game Pass, Xbox Live users, and third-party software sales.

So where are these allotment coming from?

Here’s article I alone to take into account, when I reacted so abnormally to the advance in retro games and consoles: That these remakes and re-releases and homesickness consoles serve the purpose of bolstering a now-stretched animate lifespan. The PS4 and Xbox One have been out for quite some time and several first-party developers are allegedly axis their absorption to the next generation. There’s a assertive risk to making a game for a animate so late in its life — depending on how fast gamers adopt the new bearing of consoles, you might be at risk of a concise sales window. But if you’re re-releasing an old favorite, then you’re absolution article with a proven chance of success.

Clearly retro consoles occupy the same space. Mat Piscatella tweeted, in his breakdown of the ESA’s findings, that plug-and-play accessories in part drove the rise in accouterments sales. As he said, the two-year-old NES Classic was the acknowledged of these consoles:

There’s addition account to re-releases as well: they don’t crave as much development time and assets as the boilerplate “regular” game. And we already know games can cost a lot of money to make. ’s Jason Schreier appear that a common industry ballpark for costs is “$10,000 per person per month.”

But remasters? As Piscatella told :

…given the badly lower development costs when compared to new game development, the adeptness to outsource porting to aspect houses which frees up centralized development assets to create new games, and the adeptness to abate risk since a clear demand arrangement exists to actuate which games should be remastered, the allowances of the convenance are readily credible to publishers.

I also affected the catalyst for this was coming from the developers eager to wring a few dollars out of their otherwise-dead franchises. And I’m sure that’s still the case, abnormally now that several remasterings/re-releases have made bank. But I can’t deny now that the reason these games exist is not because the industry created a market — they responded to one.

During an Activision balance call in 2017, anon after the was released, then-Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg said the aggregation was anxious until the zero hour it was accouterment to a passionate-yet-small group, only to be proven dead wrong:

We knew that there was a amorous admirers out there for Crash…. but we had no idea – it’s hard to tell whether that’s a vocal boyhood or whether that’s a real mass admirers until you put article out there. And Crash has surpassed all of our expectations by a pretty wide margin… This is a action that acutely has our attention.

Clearly, there’s a place for remasters and retro consoles in the industry’s machine-like schedule.

But my better affair still stands: this is really only a trick you can pull once. When the next bearing of consoles comes around — Project Scarlett, PS5, etc. — will we have batch of remakes, re-releases, and cornball HD collections within the next five years? Who’s going to want to buy the entire series yet again, for example, when the new animate comes out? There are only so many old consoles — how long before we get to the Wii Classic and hit a wall?

And there are a few annoying signs, I’m not gonna lie. For example, the PlayStation Classic posted only blood-warm sales, compared with the NES and SNES Classics. This could be due in part to a analogously black slate of games accompanying with a much higher price than others in its weight class — retailers have since alone the price from $100 to $60.

Read next: 8 IoT accessories that could impact the customer market in 2019