It’s not hasty how grossly underrepresented women are in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM). Hell, in the UK, half of state schools submitted no girls to study A-Level physics. Although the stats are disheartening, it doesn’t reflect women‘s ability, instead it shines an cruel light on the realities of the association we live in.

Just 17 percent of the English-language biographies on Wikipedia are about women, and female scientists in accurate  are badly represented. But physicist Jessica Wade is hoping to change this. An apostle for assortment in science, Wade balances her work as an award-winning physicist at Imperial College London with her role as a ‘Wikipedian’ — creating and uploading the biographies of scientists who are women, people of color, and part of the LGBTQI association every day.

“I’ve spent the last year trying to advance the representation of women scientists and engineers on Wikipedia, to bless the important contributors of underrepresented groups.” Wade told TNW. “I’ve afresh just accounting my 500th biography.”

After account Angela Saini’s book, Inferior: The True Power of Women and the Science That Shows It — a able look at the science behind the stereotypes that have afar women from accidental to association — Wade felt empowered to spark change.

“Reading Inferior had made me angry enough. But then to learn that Wikipedia was so bias, I had never accepted that before. I’d always affected the agreeable on its belvedere was consistently good; I was afraid to find out just how wrong I was.”

Science’s deeply rooted issue with assortment

Earlier last year, Wade started her Wikipedia activity to access the afterimage of female scientists on the site by adding small amounts of advice to its platform. Since Wade began, she’s created a page each day.

“I didn’t really expect anyone to care about what I was doing, which I guess is the absorbing part of the whole conversation. I affected people would think, ‘It’s fine. Just let her have some fun,’” says Wade. “But actually, the absolute impact it has, abnormally on people talking about stereotypes, is impactful.”

Throughout Wade’s career, convalescent assortment within science has always been a priority: “I guess my issue all along with beat and assurance [to women] is that it endlessly comes back to the altercation around role models and how ‘we need more role models’ and how ‘there aren’t enough role models.’”

“But my altercation is that there are so many role models, so many ablaze female scientists and people of color. We just don’t bless and admit them enough. We need to talk more about the ones we have, because we’re at risk of losing them and all the work they’ve done.”

STEM’s assortment issues are afflicted by long-believed civic stereotyping on gender. “Our association tells accouchement they’re good at altered things. Whether it’s pink and blue toys, whatever accouterment accouchement wear, and the books they read,” Wade explained. “Girls are told from an abundantly young age that science is for boys.”

When asked what Wade hopes to accomplish through her work on Wikipedia, she said: “If a young person is sitting at home browsing the internet, Googling article they find absorbing like altitude change or the shape of a pyramid. If they go to Wikipedia and start account the names of scientists, there will be women and people of color there, and people who look just like them who have had this massive impact on accurate discoveries.”

Wade’s work to advance science‘s assortment issue shows that women have always been there, they’ve just not been celebrated. Until now.

Read next: Hacker affairs 26M stolen user annal in barter for $5,000 worth of Bitcoin