What with Facetime, Skype, Whatsapp and Snapchat, for many people, contiguous chat is used less and less often.

These apps allow us to antipodal with each other bound and easily – advantageous distances, time zones and countries. We can even talk to basic administration such as Alexa, Cortana or Siri – advantageous them to play our admired songs, films, or tell us the acclimate forecast.

Often these ways of communicating reduce the need to speak to addition human being. This has led to some of the communicative snippets of our daily lives now taking place mainly via abstruse devices. So no longer do we need to talk with shop assistants, receptionists, bus drivers or even coworkers, we simply engage with a screen to acquaint whatever it is we want to say.

In fact, in these scenarios, we tend to only speak to other people when the agenda technology does not accomplish successfully. For instance, human acquaintance occurs when we call for an abettor to help us when an item is not accustomed at the self-service checkout.

And when we have the adeptness to affix so bound and easily with others using abstruse accessories and software applications it is easy to start to discount the value of contiguous conversation. It seems easier to text addition rather than meet with them.

Bodily cues

My analysis into agenda technologies indicates that phrases such as “word of mouth” or “keeping in touch” point to the accent of contiguous conversation. Indeed, contiguous chat can strengthen social ties: with our neighbors, friends, work colleagues and other people we appointment during our day.

It acknowledges their existence, their humanness, in ways that burning messaging and texting do not. Contiguous chat is a rich acquaintance that involves animation on memories, making connections, making mental images, associations and allotment a response. Contiguous chat is also multisensory: it’s not just about sending or accepting pre-programmed trinkets such as likes, animation love hearts and animated yellow emojis.