Humans are within years of sending the first crewed mission to Mars. And then what? Maybe addition 100 years from now we’ll eventually have the assets to launch deeper crewed missions from there, eventually extensive as far as… about near Neptune. Our accepted method of space travel simply isn’t good enough to get us out of our own galactic suburb. And we can thank Einstein for that.

A little over a aeon ago he came up with this big idea that it would take more energy than there is in the entire cosmos to make an object travel faster than the speed of light. That’s a big bummer for anyone who’s ever dreamed that humankind would one day “explore aberrant new worlds” and “seek out new life and new civilizations.”

We’re going to need warp engines, or article similar, to “boldly go” much added than the borders of our own solar system. But rules are rules and we’re absurd to figure out how to move a spaceship faster than the speed of light any time soon. There might, however, be a way to cheat.

Joseph Agnew, an undergraduate from the University of Alabama in Huntsville’s Propulsion Analysis Center, thinks we can create a warp engine able of riding a space wave into the future. No, that’s not a crappy advertisement for a 1980s cola product. It’s science.

According to his alluring analysis paper:

One accurate concept, which will be discussed here, stood out among the rest, and was brought into actuality mathematically through the work of Miguel Alcubierre. Inspired in part by the drive of like name in the Star Trek series, he devised this metric which served as a band-aid for Einstein’s General Relativity Equations, and declared a alluring superluminal-apparent concept.

In essence, what this metric describes is a way of inducing a curvature of spacetime in a manner akin to an ocean wave. One creates a ‘high-pressure’ curvature behind, and a ‘low pressure’ curvature in front, and the vessel inside of this consistent ‘bubble’ is moved with space to a destination.

Basically if you can’t go faster than light, make the cosmos expand and arrangement around you so that you’ve absolutely moved further than you could have traveling at the speed of light, after ever breaking Einstein’s speed limit.

Alcubierre’s reseach paper declared a groundbreaking warp theory that worked within the borders of Einstein’s relativity. The very idea that such an idea could logically be put to paper in the ambience of accurate rigor is astounding. But the big catechism of “how” remained. As Agnew put it in his paper:

It is a great advance to call a set of equations that appear to allow spacetime to behave in a assertive manner, but scrutinization is appropriate to find the algebraic and concrete objections to its actual manifestation.

On the algebraic side, there were raised flags about the energy states and requirements of the drive, the adeptness to ascendancy the warp bubble from inside, both when moving and when stationary, and the abeyant agent violations associated with ‘apparent’ superluminal speeds.

On the concrete side, the primary catechism was “how?”, which came with an array of sub-topics which needed to be addressed, such as the actuality of exotic matter and of spacetime curvature, and the adeptness to accouter and dispense those.

Agnew lays out some abeyant solutions – based on what must have been years of all-embracing analysis – that have a believable foundation in accepted technology. In essence, if the plan is to create a giant wave in the space-time continuum in order to warp a space craft from point A to point B, the botheration can be broken down into award the fuel, addition out how to make a wave, and making sure we don’t break article important… like reality.

The first part’s easy, we just need to abide our analysis on exotic matter and we’ll eventually, hopefully find a way to power this thing. The second part, creating the wave, might sound like the hard part, but really it’s just a matter of extending the accepted advance analysis into force waves – conceivably we can use exotic matter-powered electro magnets to cause some sort of programmable black hole.

The real hard part is ambidextrous with the radiation and free what happens when we have the human adventurousness to accept it’s okay to go around addition and squishing the very fabric of the universe. There’s some affair that high speed breakthrough collisions could have some uh, abrogating furnishings such as ripping a hole in the cosmos itself. But, according to Agnew, there’s reason for hope there as well:

One of the most useful developments on this front, from a very recent 2018 paper, describes the botheration in question, and proposes that it may be a non-factor. To abridge their highly important progress, they note that the admission matter and photons will be slowed down when entering the front, warped region (using the Broeck metric), and accordingly will not admit high acceleration collisions.

Agnew’s research is both a roadmap for accepted advisers and a really cool paper to affect future ones. The ideas inside it are outrageous, but the most acute analysis often is. A warp drive is acutely believable and, admitting the fact that only a scattering of advisers are taking it seriously, the past decade has brought a series of cogent breakthroughs in about fields that makes it seem absolute likely.

What do you think? Will flesh one day flit across the cosmos like a temporally-unfettered firefly, or are we doomed to muck about in our own galaxy’s filth forever?

Read next: Zuck says he’s ready for a fight if Elizabeth Warren is adopted