If thoughts, animosity and other mental activities are annihilation more than electrochemical signals abounding around a vast arrangement of brain cells, will abutting these signals with agenda electronics allow us to enhance the abilities of our brains?

That’s what tech administrator Elon Musk appropriate in a recent presentation of the Neuralink device, an avant-garde brain-machine interface built-in in a pig called Gertrude. But how achievable is his vision? When I raised some brief anxiety about the science, Musk absolved them in a tweet saying: “It is abominably common for many in academia to ample the value of ideas and angular bringing them to fruition. The idea of going to the moon is trivial, but going to the moon is hard.”

Brain-machine interfaces use electrodes to construe neuronal advice into commands able of authoritative alien systems such as a computer or automatic arm. I accept the work circuitous in architecture one. In 2005, I helped beforehand Neurochips, which recorded brain signals, known as action potentials, from single cells for days at a time and could even send electrical pulses back into the skull of an animal. We were using them to create bogus access amid brain areas and aftermath abiding changes in brain networks.

Unique brains

Neuroscientists have, in fact, been alert to brain cells in awake animals since the 1950s. At the turn of the 21st century, brain signals from monkeys were used to ascendancy an bogus arm. And in 2006, the BrainGate team began implanting arrays of 100 electrodes in the brains of bedridden people, enabling basic ascendancy of computer cursors and advantageous devices.

I say this not to abate the beforehand made by the Neuralink team. They have built a device to relay signals wirelessly from 1,024 electrodes built-in into Gertrude’s brain by a adult robot. The team is making rapid beforehand appear a human trial, and I accept their work could beforehand the achievement of brain-controlled accessories for people living with disabilities.

But Musk has more aggressive goals, hoping to read and write thoughts and memories, enable clear-sighted advice and ultimately merge human and bogus intelligence (AI). This is absolutely not “trivial”, and I don’t think the barriers can be affected by technology alone.

Today, most brain-machine interfaces use an access called “biomimetic” decoding. First, brain action is recorded while the user imagines assorted accomplishments such as moving their arm left or right. Once we know which brain cells prefer altered directions, we can “decode” consecutive movements by tallying their action potentials like votes.

This access works abundantly for simple movements, but can it ever generalize to more circuitous mental processes? Even if Neuralink could sample enough of the 100 billion cells in my brain, how many altered thoughts would I first have to think to calibrate a useful mind-reading device, and how long would that take? Does my brain action even sound the same each time I think the same thought? And when I think of, say, going to the Moon, does my brain sound annihilation like Musk’s?

Some advisers hope that AI can abstain these problems, in the same way it has helped computers to accept speech. Perhaps given enough data, AI could learn to accept the signals from anyone’s brain. However, unlike thoughts, accent acquired for advice with others, so altered speakers share common rules such as grammar and syntax.

While the all-embracing analysis of altered brains is similar, at the level of alone brain cells, we are all unique. Recently, neuroscientists have started exploring average scales, analytic for anatomy in the action patterns of large groups of cells. Perhaps, in future, we will bare a set of accepted rules for anticipation processes that will abridge the task of mind reading. But the state of our accepted compassionate offers no guarantees.

Alternatively, we might accomplishment the brain’s own intelligence. Perhaps we should think of brain-machine interfaces as tools that we have to master, like acquirements to drive a car. When people are shown a real-time affectation of the signal from alone cells in their own brain, they can often learn to access or abatement that action through a action called neurofeedback.

Maybe when using the Neuralink, people might be able to learn how to actuate their brain cells in the right way to ascendancy the interface. However, recent analysis suggests that the brain may not be as adjustable as we once anticipation and, so far, neurofeedback capacity attempt to aftermath circuitous patterns of brain action that differ from those occurring naturally.

When it comes to influencing, rather than reading, the brain, the challenges are greater still. Electrical dispatch activates many cells around each electrode, as was nicely shown in the Neuralink presentation. But cells with altered roles are mixed together, so it is hard to aftermath a allusive experience. Stimulating visual areas of the brain may allow blind people to apperceive flashes of light, but we are still far from breeding even simple visual scenes. Optogenetics, which uses light to actuate genetically adapted brain cells, can be more careful but has yet to be attempted in the human brain.

Whether or not Musk can – or should – accomplish his ultimate aims, the assets that he and other tech entrepreneurs are beforehand in brain-machine interfaces are sure to beforehand our accurate understanding. I hope that Musk shares his wireless implant with the many scientists who are also trying to break the mysteries of the brain.

That said, decades of analysis have shown that the brain does not yield its secrets easily and is likely to resist our attempts at mind hacking for some decades yet.

Read next: Could there be life on Venus?