The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) today filed a motion with a Federal court requesting abstracts pertaining to an FBI attack to force Facebook to hack its own Messenger account be unsealed.

The US Department of Amends (DOJ) abominably tried to order Facebook to alter its Messenger code beforehand this year. The appeal came as part of an FBI case adjoin declared MS-13 gang associates accused of agitated crimes.

What the government sought at the time was access to encrypted Messenger calls. According to letters from and the , a judge denied the appeal and a consecutive motion to hold Facebook in antipathy for its abnegation to comply with the DOJ order.

Facebook’s Messenger app can be used to make voice calls over the internet as well as sending text messages. The FBI reportedly already has text letters from the declared gang members, but isn’t able to “wiretap” the voice account due to Messenger’s end-to-end encryption for calls. So the DOJ ordered Facebook to “decrypt” the calls.

The social arrangement reportedly beneath the demand on the basis that it would about crave the social arrangement to carbon a abundant allocation of the app’s code and “hack” its own users.

Apple CEO Tim Cook found his aggregation in a agnate bearings in 2016 when authorities accepted he bypass iPhone aegis on a device used by a terrorist. As is the case with Facebook now, Cook declined.

But, to his credit, his acumen was that Apple is committed to the aloofness of its users, and he wasn’t accommodating to set a antecedent that endangered the aloofness of hundreds of millions of people.

The ACLU, on behalf of all US citizens, now wants to know absolutely why the FBI anticipation it could compel Facebook to hack its own users. A adumbrative told TNW:

We’re asking the court to make public the legal acumen that absitively the case, what ascendancy the Amends Department anticipation it had to force Facebook to attenuate its aegis infrastructure, and why the court bent the government was wrong.

The bottom line is the US government is making decisions about our aloofness behind closed doors, in the caliginosity of justice. And, since there’s no reason to accept law administration agencies won’t abide to test the limits of our right to privacy, it follows that those who are against to government bamboozle should have access to case annal in order to study and accept precedent.

Read next: Spotify unveils this year's amusing Wrapped billboards