There is growing affair about the abeyant for the bulletin and media administration belvedere WhatsApp to attenuate capitalism in a number of countries across the world including Brazil and India.

Because WhatsApp is encrypted – and so offers users far greater aegis from case than Twitter or Facebook – it has become decidedly belled for overextension “fake news”.

This is a major affair in Africa, where WhatsApp is the most accepted messaging app in 40 countries. This is due to its low cost and the adeptness to easily share letters with both individuals and groups.

But is this really how WhatApp is used? And if it is, to what extent does this accommodation the affection of elections?

A joint team from the Centre for Capitalism and Development (Nigeria) and the University of Birmingham (UK) has spent the last few months researching the impact of WhatsApp on the 2019 Nigerian elections held in May.

Their report comes to abstracts that are both troubling, as well as encouraging.

The analysis reveals that the belvedere was used to mislead voters in more adult ways. But it also shows that WhatsApp adequate capitalism in other areas.

Misinformation and disinformation

The term “fake news has become widely used over the past few years. However, it is ambiguous because it lumps calm very altered kinds of advice and behavior. For example, we need to abstracted out advised attempts to mislead others by creating false belief (disinformation) from the innocent administration of made up belief by people who accept it to be true (misinformation).

The 2019 Nigerian elections saw both bamboozlement and misinformation. We advised this by administering 46 interviews in the states of Abuja, Oyo and Kano, as well as seven focus groups and a survey of 1,005 people.

During the course of administering the analysis candidates consistently told us that they predominantly used WhatsApp to share advice about their qualities and attack pledges. But many WhatsApp users said that at a high admeasurement of the letters they accustomed were advised to attenuate a rival leader’s acceptability – to “decampaign” them.

There were some high contour examples of disinformation. The most belled story broadcast on social media was that the admiral had died while ability medical analysis alfresco of the country, and had been replaced by a clone from Sudan.

Other bogus communications were less alien but no less significant. Many accustomed citizens shared these messages, in some cases because they knew they were false and wanted to amplify their impact, but in many cases because they anticipation they were true.

The most able decampaigning strategies were those that shared letters that resonated with individuals because they independent an aspect of the truth, or played on recent experiences.

WhatsApp takes over

The political access of WhatsApp has broadcast rapidly in line with its growing penetration. As a result, it has become part of the fabric of acclamation campaigns and is now a key apparatus through which political leaders seek to acquaint with their attack teams and supporters.

Fully 91 percent of the people we interviewed were active WhatsApp users; as one person put it:

I use WhatsApp more than I use the toilet.

In Nigeria, acclamation candidates were already using the belvedere to push letters in 2015. But the people we interviewed agreed that the 2019 elections saw a cogent step up in terms of how the arch parties organized their social media strategy.

Politically, WhatsApp was used in an more adult way at the presidential level. In 2019, the two main presidential candidates – Admiral Muhammadu Buhari and action leader Atiku Abubakar – both had committed teams blame out letters over social media: the Buhari New Media Centre and Atikulated Youth Force. By basic hundreds of Whatsapp groups of 256 members, these organizations could send letters to tens of bags of people at the touch of a button.

Buhari’s effort was better funded and decidedly impressive. It accustomed a arrangement of local and bounded assembly affiliated to a “central command” in Abuja. This enabled the attack to rapidly send letters from the civic to the local level, while also responding to adverse letters and rumors shared by its rivals.

While those in power about had more money to invest in their campaigns, many action leaders acicular out that in important ways WhatsApp had created a more level political arena field. Those who had been complex in backroom for some time explained that “fake news” was annihilation new in Nigeria, but that in the past it was sometimes absurd to annul these letters because there was no way to get airtime on government accumbent radio.

WhatsApp had afflicted this situation. Action leaders now have a cheap way of angry back. It has also been used to alike anti-corruption campaigns and acclamation observation, deepening democracy.

Evolution or revolution?

It’s also important not to enlarge the acceptation of WhatsApp. Things look very altered below the civic level, for example, where attack structures were less developed and a cogent admeasurement of action remained informal.

We found that while candidates for Governor and Member of Parliament did set up WhatsApp groups, they were much less organized. In many cases, candidates relied on absolute networks and social influencers to get the bulletin out.

Candidates were also keen to stress that while they used WhatsApp during their campaigns, they did not rely on it. Voters expect to see their leaders on the ground, and accepted them to accommodate a range of casework for the community. Advertising good deeds over WhatsApp could help a leader get credit, but only if they had accomplished their responsibilities in the first place.

In other words, WhatsApp can amplify and accompaniment a candidate’s ground campaign. But it cannot alter it.

Throwing out the water but befitting the baby

These allegation advance that solutions to the power of social media platforms like WhatsApp isn’t to ban them, or to allow governments to censor them. This would merely amplify the vast advantages of incumbency that ruling parties already enjoy.

A better band-aid would be to advance agenda literacy, advance social media codes of conduct around elections, and empower WhatsApp uses to ascendancy which groups they are added to, and what advice they receive.

Read next: How to create professional-looking business emails for under $20