Beyond Meat has taken the world by storm. Its signature “bleeding” burger manages to resemble that of real meat and has become a menu item at a number of restaurants, from TGI Friday to Carl’s Jr. — its competitor, Impossible Burger, just rolled out civic at Burger King.

Perhaps activity the pressure, a group called the Center for Consumer Freedom — a PR group that has done work food companies, restaurants, and other appropriate interests (including the meat industry) — has taken out full-page ads in the New York Post and Wall Street Journal highlighting the actinic additives in the plant-based burgers.

Another important item of note is that the Center for Consumer Freedom, run by lobbyist Richard Berman, ahead argued adjoin blurred the blood booze agreeable to 0.08 in most states, lobbied adjoin adopting the minimum wage, and has claimed that the Centers for Disease Control was “whipping up fear over food” when it issued warnings about salmonella. This is an alignment run by a man who once said — when lobbying for the tobacco industry — “smoking won’t kill you; over-regulation will.”

But, let’s get back to the issue at hand.

The ads, titled “Fake Meat, Real Chemicals” analyze the capacity in “real” and “fake” bacon, which… are a little misleading. This is a burger, after all. Plant-based or not, it’s still not meant to be a food item you base an entire diet around.


Clearly the ads are announcement a pro-meat agenda, hinting that the chemicals added to Beyond Meat’s burger made it less healthy. put this to the test, hiring four nutritionists to appraise the 22 ingredients. By and large, the group classified the burger as a “sometimes” item, acceptation it can serve as an casual treat, much like a burger made of real beef.

Two of the nutritionists liked that the burger independent more than double the fiber of a meat-based patty. Some also accepted the burger as a good source of protein since it independent the same 20 grams (approximately) of a acceptable patty — not to acknowledgment it’s a convalescent protein source.

And while the burger is indeed more candy than its ground beef analogue all four nutritionists agreed that candy doesn’t necessarily equate to junk. Peanut butter, cheese, yogurt, and other foods we about accede to be advantageous are also processed.

In general, it’s the quick serve items that are most awkward when because the dangers of candy foods — candy, potato chips, soda, or frozen dinners.

As one nutritionist acicular out, it’s important to analyze the additive list, and in Beyond Burger’s case, these additives were things like mung bean protein, apple extract, and amethyst fruit power.

All of the nutritionists agreed that Beyond Burger is the convalescent of the two options, even with its almost large list of capacity and additives. But it’s not perfect. It isn’t necessarily “healthy,” nor less fatty or caloric than a acceptable burger. But it is a convalescent another — for you, and the planet.

Still, one nutritionist took issue with a accurate item in the additive list. “I don’t love that the patties are made with attic oil,” she told . “This is a source of saturated fat, and you’ll see that one burger contains 30 percent of the [recommended daily] value.” As saturated fats go, attic oil contains more than both butter and lard — it’s best used sparingly.

Coconut oil aside, as long as you aren’t eating them daily, meatless burgers from both Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger are indeed a safer another to a acceptable ground beef patty.

Don’t accept the hype.

Read next: Twitter invests in ShareChat, an Indian social arrangement for bounded accent users