One year ago in India’s capital, New Delhi, the #MeToo movement started to pick up pace as hundreds of sexual aggravation and abuse survivors anonymously shared their adventures online. Many of these testimonials were appear by bearding social media accounts to assure survivors’ identity, and safely raise acquaintance of the realities of sexual advance in India. 

The hashtag, first made viral in Hollywood, ushered in a new era of feminist activism, with hopes to fundamentally shift association around the globe — but thanks to India’s judiciary, Facebook could break a lot of the advance made in the country, while also putting survivors at risk.

As appear by HuffPost today, The Delhi High Court has ordered Facebook to reveal the identities behind the bearding account, “Scene and Herd.” This Instagram profile, with over 5,000 followers and at least 70 testimonials from survivors, started last year as a belvedere for women to anonymously share their adventures of sexual aggravation and abuse, accurately in India’s art industry. 

A name that pops up assorted times in these testimonials is Subodh Gupta, a accepted Indian artist. Some affidavit posts call how he tried to touch women after consent, and addition states how the artist asked a woman to pose naked for him, even after being “clearly banned every time.” However, Gupta denies any claims made adjoin him.

Because of these allegations, Gupta is suing the alien users of the “Scene and Herd” for civil aspersion and claiming about 49,600,000 INR ($700,000) in damages. On September 20, the court ordered Facebook to hand over advice anecdotic the person(s) behind the annual in time for the next hearing, which is set to take place on November 18.

How this could affect Facebook’s future administration of user privacy

According to HuffPost, Facebook, the parent aggregation of Instagram, has beneath to animadversion on its next steps for this case. However, the platform’s final accommodation could have abiding furnishings on how the tech giant deals with the aloofness and anonymity of its 2.4 billion global users of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.

If Facebook decides to unmask the users behind the #MeToo affidavit Instagram account, it’s likely to fuel debate and criticism on how big companies like Facebook and Google handle data and aloofness on a mass scale, and more chiefly how it shares data with law administration agencies. 

Gupta’s aspersion case relates to the Indian government’s anecdotal that social media must be regulated “for the public good.” But as HuffPost points out, in this specific case, the public good is only benefiting advantaged and able men, like Gupta, adjoin bearding women who said he had sexually addled or abused them. 

Read next: Dad and babe to serve time over mail-order cryptocurrency drug ring