The altitude crisis is a heavily accessory issue in US politics. Thought it’s not a hard-and-fast rule, most Democrats accept the fossil fuel industry needs to be heavily-checked and nearly all Republicans accept money from oil companies. There are Democrats who take money from big oil and Republican climate-activists, but those are exceptions.

Whether you agree with the overwhelming majority of scientists (excluding those whose studies were commissioned anon or alongside by the fossil fuel industry) or you accept the politicians and businesspersons who disagree with them, it stands to reason that a social media aggregation claiming to be candid to backroom should abjure from allotment a side.

When Cheep CEO Jack Dorsey appear that he’d directed his aggregation to ban all political ads – accurately those for specific candidates and those accompanying to specific issues – most of us affected that “all political ads” meant all political ads. That acceptance was, evidently, wrong.

An analysis by anchorman Emily Atkin, author of the accomplished HEATED newsletter, appear that Cheep intends to ban issue ads from altitude crisis activists, but not fossil fuel companies. Atkin writes:

a HEATED analysis articular more than a dozen tweets from ExxonMobil accompanying to altitude change that are not currently labelled by Cheep as political “issue” ads. Under the new policy, these ads will be acceptable to run after November 22, while ecology groups’ climate-related ads will be banned.

The casual eyewitness may see this as a simple case of Exxon announcement its business, while activists are blame an agenda – but that’s the problem. Without pushback, tweets like the afterward make it seem like Exxon is on our side, it’s making strides and alive to fight alarming carbon dioxide:

The truth, however, is that President Donald Trump, the GOP, and the fossil fuel industry are affianced in a affray fight for the future of big oil. Democrats want to see the fossil fuel industry dismantled and arch presidential candidates such as Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have already signaled they’d hold big oil answerable for lying to the public about its ecology impact.

Trump‘s done his part, he’s repealed every Obama-era altitude aegis he could. He’s made the US the only developed nation to abjure from the Paris Altitude Accord, and continues to fight on behalf of the fossil fuel industry on a daily basis.

Now Cheep CEO Jack Dorsey‘s done his. In a move that Democrats acclaimed before seeing the fine print, Dorsey’s given Trump his better political achievement since 2016: an accustomed belvedere for the fossil fuel industry to spend as much money as it wants to acceptable us all that it’s on our side and the altitude shift activists are the real villains.

For its part, Trump‘s attack is arena it straight. Attack head Brad Parscale corrective the move as “dumb” and claimed Cheep would lose money. The Trump administering is accession the ban as a ploy by Cheep to silence — admitting the fact that the affirmation acutely supports the opposite.

But, because Trump doesn’t need to acquirement ad space on Cheep to aerate the reach of his message, this appears to be a toothless objection.

Realistically the ad ban is a dream come true for the fossil fuel industry. But it’s still just the second better gift Dorsey and Cheep have given Trump. The first was canonizing political speech as above the law when it comes to Twitter‘s terms of service.

Read next: Why the quickest path to human-level AI may be absolution it evolve on its own