Yesterday, the US House Oversight and Reform subcommittee appear an analysis into accepted dating apps including Tinder, Grindr, and Bumble for allegedly acceptance minors and bedevilled sex offenders to use their services. 

In a press absolution issued yesterday, the Chairman of the subcommittee, Raja Krishnamoorthi, sent belletrist to Match Group, Inc — the parent aggregation of major dating apps — gluttonous advice accompanying to recent letters that abundant dating apps have failed to finer screen out arrears users, “which creates alarming and inappropriate situations.”

Dating casework will have to hand over advice on the age of its users, the action it takes to verify ages, and any complaints raised by users apropos assault, rape, or use by minors.

[Read: Report: Tinder’s new panic button is administration your data with Facebook and YouTube]

“Our affair about the arrears use of dating apps is acute by letters that many accepted free dating apps permit registered sex offenders to use them, while the paid versions of these same apps screen out registered sex offenders,” Krishnamoorthi wrote. “Protection from sexual predators should not be a luxury bedfast to paying customers.”

The report Krishnamoorthi is apropos to is an investigation by ProPublica, BuzzFeed, and Columbia Journalism Investigations last year. They found that more than 150 instances of sexual advance involving dating apps, and about 10 percent complex users being akin with dates who had ahead been accused or bedevilled of sexual assault.

At the time of the report, a Match Group agent called the report “disingenuous” and “inaccurate,” though beneath to animadversion on any specific facts appear in the story. However, the account did say that Match Group didn’t aggregate enough data on its free users to conduct allusive accomplishments checks.

“As technology evolves, we will abide to aggressively deploy new tools to eradicate bad actors, including users of our free articles like Tinder, Plenty of Fish, and OkCupid where we are not able to obtain acceptable and reliable advice to make allusive accomplishments checks possible.”

In a account to Time, the Match Group said the US civic sex blackmailer anthology needs to be adapted so perpetrators’ agenda aisle can be tracked and blocked by social media and dating services.

As well as administration advice on its users’ ages, the advised dating apps have been asked to share its aloofness behavior along with its terms and altitude and how the aggregation handles  calm user data including sexual acclimatization and political views, among others. 

This isn’t the only altercation facing dating apps at the moment. Earlier this week, a report by Gizmodo found that Tinder’s new “Panic Button” is sharing users’ data with ad-tech companies including Facebook and YouTube. 

Read next: Don't be fooled: Blockchains are not phenomenon aegis solutions