The “dark web” – a accumulating of heavily encrypted websites, forums and social networks – awfully provides spaces for actionable activities. It’s where child sexual offenders meet to abutment each other and share blue images and advice on abuse techniques – with near-complete anonymity. This provides a ability for individuals to learn the “skills” to become more alarming offenders.

In response, some law administration agencies deploy clandestine admiral to enter these spaces posing as offenders to gather intelligence. But we don’t hear much about these communities. When it comes to online child abuse, it is abundantly belief of online admonishment that boss the press. As part of my recent PhD research, however, I offer an acumen into dark web communities of sexual offenders by analysing their language.

Interactions amid offenders have a adverse impact on victims. We need to accept them better, abnormally if this helps police to agitate behind communities. Given that the online activities are almost alone linguistic, a good way to do this is with accent analysis. This can help us accept how an administrator might “authentically” portray an blackmailer online.

Abusive communities are absolute by strict rules – for example, not giving out claimed advice – to bottle security. Invariably, they are made up of associates with capricious levels of behind acquaintance and expertise. An absorbing subgroup are those who analyze as “newbies”, with little or no acquaintance of abusing or interacting in dark web environments.

Understanding newbies can help actuate offenders’ acquaintance levels. It is the first step to tracking how offenders advance to become more accomplished and prolific. It can also help clandestine police to portray astute identities. When interacting with offenders who are often acutely cagey and keenly aware of accessible police presence, posing as the newbie might in fact be the easiest way to enter an behind community.