Facebook Messenger and Instagram’s direct messaging casework will be chip into one system, Facebook has announced.

The merge will allow shared messaging across both platforms, as well as video calls and the use of a range of tools drawn from both platforms. It’s currently being rolled out across countries on an opt-in basis, but hasn’t yet accomplished Australia.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg appear plans in March last year to accommodate Messenger, Instagram Direct and WhatsApp into a unified messaging experience.

At the crux of this was the goal to administrate end-to-end encryption across the whole messaging “ecosystem”.

Ostensibly, this was part of Facebook’s renewed focus on privacy, in the wake of several highly appear scandals. Most notable was its poor data aegis that accustomed political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to steal data from 87 actor Facebook accounts and use it to target users with political ads ahead of the 2016 US presidential election.

In a account appear bygone on the new merge, Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri and Messenger vice admiral Stan Chudnovsky wrote:

… one out of three people sometimes find it difficult to bethink where to find a assertive chat thread. With this update, it will be even easier to stay affiliated after cerebration about which app to use to reach your accompany and family.

While that may seem harmless, it’s likely Facebook is absolutely attempting to make its apps inseparable, ahead of a abeyant anti-trust accusation in the US that may try to see the aggregation sell Instagram and WhatsApp.

Together, with Facebook, 24/7

The Messenger/Instagram Direct merge will extend to appearance rolled out during the pandemic, such as the “Watch Together” tool for Messenger. As the name suggests, this lets users watch videos calm in real time. Now, both Messenger and Instagram users will be able to use it, behindhand of which app they’re on.

With the integration, new aloofness challenges emerge. Facebook has already accustomed this. And these challenges will present admitting Facebook’s overarching aloofness policy applying to every app in its app “family”.

For example, in the new merged messaging ecosystem, a user you ahead blocked on Messenger won’t automatically be blocked on Instagram. Thus, the blocked person will be able to once again acquaintance you. This could open doors to a deluge of abrupt online abuse.

Why this is good for Mark Zuckerberg

This first step – and Facebook’s full roadmap for the encrypted affiliation of WhatsApp, Instagram Direct and Messenger – has three clear outcomes.

Firstly, end-to-end encryption means Facebook will have complete deniability for annihilation that campaign across its messaging tools.

It won’t be able to “see” the messages. While this might be good from a user aloofness perspective, it also means annihilation from bullying, to scams, to actionable drug sales, to paedophilia can’t be policed if it happens via these tools.

This would stop Facebook being blamed for aching or actionable uses of its services. As far as abstinent the belvedere goes, Facebook would finer become “invisible” (not to acknowledgment balance is big-ticket and complicated).

This is all great news for Mark Zuckerberg, abnormally as Facebook stares down the barrel of abeyant anti-trust litigation.

Secondly, once the apps are merged, functionally they will no longer be abstracted platforms. They will still as abstracted apps with some abstracted features, but the vast amount of claimed data basement them will live in one giant, shared database.

Deeper data affiliation will let Facebook know users more intimately. Moreover, it will be able to advantage this new acumen to target users with more announcement and expand further.

Finally, and conceivably most concerning, is that by amalgam its apps Facebook could accurately acknowledge to anti-trust lawsuits by saying it can’t abstracted Instagram or WhatsApp from the main Facebook belvedere – because they’re the same thing now.

And if they can’t be separated, there’s no way Facebook could sell Instagram or WhatsApp, even if it wanted to.

100 billion letters a day

The messaging cartage across Facebook’s platforms is vast, with more than 100 billion letters sent daily. And this has only added during the COVID-19 pandemic.

With the sheer size of its user database, Facebook continues to either purchase, or squash, its competition. Concerns about the aggregation being a cartel aren’t after merit.

Researchers and founding Facebook advisers have called to have the aggregation split up – and for Instagram and Whatsapp to become abstracted again.

Just a few months ago, Facebook appear its Instagram-housed tool Reels which bears a arresting affinity to TikTok, addition social app across-the-board the globe.

It seems this is just addition archetype of Facebook trying to use the sheer size of its arrangement to stifle growing competition, aided (perhaps unwittingly) by Donald Trump’s anti-China sentiment.

If antagonism is important to auspicious addition and diversity, then the newest development from Facebook discourages both these things. It added entrenches Facebook and its casework into the lives of consumers, making it harder to pull away. And this absolutely isn’t far from monopolistic behavior.

Read next: Musk has hinted at Tesla's Indian entry for 4 years now — just do it already!