Running is one of the world’s most accepted concrete activities, but, unlike other sports, the boilerplate actor is rarely coached. If you play football, squash, hockey, or train a aggressive art, the affairs are you’ve had or have lessons. But running? I know folks who have completed assorted marathons, but have never even spoken with a coach.

This is where Runvi comes in. The device – which has accomplished its allotment goal on Kickstarter – aims to be an AI-running coach by allegory the way you move. It consists of two insoles (one for each shoe – revolutionary, I know) that both accommodate 15 burden sensors and one accelerator, all of which aggregate data on your active style.

This is tied calm by article the aggregation calls the Core, which is a disposable part of the insole. It operates as the brain center of the Runvi; it also powers the sensors, and logs and stores the data, before sending it to a smartphone.

webrok

Once the data alcove your smartphone, the app can begin ‘coaching’ you. It can either do this by assuming you data from your run afterwards, or giving you tips and hints in real-time to advance your form and anticipate injuries. In other words, your shoes become a smelly, sticky, sweaty active coach.

All this makes a lot of sense to me. I’ve been active recreationally for years, have never had an ounce of apprenticeship and, wonderfully, managed to injure my knee while doing so. As I’m absurd to be paying a active coach anytime soon, but have no botheration battery out for accessories (don’t @ me), it makes the €199 (approximately $230) an adorable proposition.

Hmm, ambiguous decision-making, bud, but okay. Still, this all sounds a bit too good…

Ah, you know me too well, aerial voice. Runvi isn’t after its flaws. First up, according to the company, the insoles will only last for about six months of running. As the Core is disposable you won’t have to buy the whole set-up, but a pair of backup insoles will set you back €60 (approximately $69).

I also have some questions apropos how authentic the “AI technology” inside the app is. When I put this to the company, the agent told me that they have an “optimal active technique” as a benchmark. Then, you “complete a baseline run” and the “algorithm compares your data to this,” before alms you advice.

My issue is whether or not a one-size-fits-all active style, you know, absolutely exists. Individuals with abiding injuries, altered levels of fitness, or assertive body shapes might have gaits and styles more acceptable to them than a connected benchmark. Still, I feel this is article we need to put to the test by absolutely using the product.

There are other active articles out there – the Lumo Run or Arion, which is addition insole tracker, for archetype – but Runvi, on the apparent at least, appears to be superior. It has more sensors, is cheaper than Arion, and is more self-contained, as it doesn’t need annihilation hooking over your shoe.

It’s vital to bethink this is just on paper though. While the idea and set-up looks promising, we’ll have to wait until we have the concrete copies in our hands, or, you know, in our shoes, before we can see how it works in reality. Until then, I’m agilely hopeful I won’t hurt my knee any more.

Read next: The change of 'woke' emoji